The IRS has released interim guidance (Notice 2026-16 (PDF - 241KB)) addressing the new special depreciation allowance for qualified production property (QPP) under Section 168(n). The release provides the first substantive guidance on application of the new statute and addresses several issues, including definitions, basis allocation and depreciation recapture.
Taxpayers are not required to rely on the notice but may do so for property placed in service in a taxable year beginning before the publication of forthcoming proposed regulations, which are intended to be consistent with the notice. Taxpayers that choose to rely on the notice must do so in its entirety and cannot selectively rely on certain provisions of the notice while taking differing positions on other provisions.
Background
The 2025 bill known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) introduced new Section 168(n), which allows for 100% expensing of certain nonresidential real property used in a qualified production activity (QPA) within the U.S. To qualify as QPP eligible for the accelerated deduction, property must meet several statutory requirements, including:
- Property must be nonresidential real property
- Construction must begin after Jan. 19, 2025, and before Jan. 1, 2029
- Property must be placed in service in the U.S. after July 4, 2025, and before Jan. 1, 2031
- The original use of the property must begin with the taxpayer
- The property must be used by the taxpayer as an integral part of a QPA, which includes manufacturing, production, and refining of qualified products
- The taxpayer must elect to treat the property as QPP
- The alternative depreciation system may not apply to such property
As a newly enacted provision, Section 168(n) raises a number of interpretive and implementation questions for taxpayers. (See our prior article for more information on the statutory requirements of Section 168(n)).
Proposed guidance
The guidance provided in Notice 2026-16 generally aligns with the statutory requirements of Section 168(n) and addresses several key aspects, including:
- Definition of QPP, including rules for determining eligible and ineligible property
- Definition of QPA and other relevant terms
- Basis allocation rules
- Procedures for making a QPP election
- The 10-year depreciation recapture rule
In addition, the notice generally provides that special rules for a) property placed in service and disposed of in the same taxable year, b) redetermination of basis and c) like-kind exchanges and involuntary conversions are consistent with rules under the bonus depreciation rules in Treas. Reg. §1.168(k)-2.
Qualified production property
Section 4 of the notice generally provides that QPP is nonresidential real property that is MACRS property placed in service in the U.S. or any U.S. territory and satisfies the following four requirements:
- Integral part requirement: Property satisfies this requirement if a QPA is conducted in, or takes place within, the physical space of such property. If a QPA is conducted in only a portion of the property, only such portion satisfies this requirement.
- Original use requirement: The original use of the property commences with the taxpayer.
- Beginning of construction requirement: Construction must begin after Jan. 19, 2025, and before Jan. 1, 2029.
- Placed-in-service-date requirement – The property is placed in service after July 4, 2025, and before Jan. 1, 2031. A special rule provides an automatic one-year extension for any property located in a disaster area at any time during 2030.
Much of the interim guidance that is relevant for evaluating these requirements incorporates rules from existing regulations. For example:
- Rules for determining a unit of property are based on the MACRS disposition rules in Treas. Reg. §1.168(i)-8(c)(4), which generally provide that each building, including its structural components, is a single unit of property, and that an improvement or addition to an asset after it is placed in service is treated as a separate unit of property.
- Taxpayers determine whether the original use requirement and the beginning of construction requirement are satisfied by applying rules consistent with the bonus depreciation rules in Treas. Reg. §§1.168(k)-2(b)(3) and (b)(5), which includes the 10% safe harbor to determine when construction of self-constructed property begins.
A special rule applies for determining whether the original use and the beginning of construction requirements are satisfied for certain acquired property. Under this rule, the property must be acquired by a taxpayer after Jan. 19, 2025, and before Jan. 1, 2029.
Additionally, the property must not have been used by the taxpayer at any time prior to the acquisition and may not have been used in a QPA by any person during the period beginning Jan. 1, 2021, and ending on May 12, 2025. Taxpayers should apply rules consistent with Treas. Reg. §§1.168(k)-2 and 1.1502-68 to evaluate whether property satisfies the acquisition date test and prior use test for this special rule.
Grant Thornton insight:
The notice’s adoption of rules consistent with existing depreciation guidance, such as the bonus depreciation regulations, may simplify the evaluation of these requirements for taxpayers. However, because reliance on the notice is optional, some taxpayers may find that choosing not to apply the notice provides greater flexibility until proposed or final rules are issued.
Determining eligible property
In general, each unit of property must separately satisfy the integral part requirement. However, the notice provides both a de minimis rule and a special rule for integrated facilities for purposes of evaluating this requirement.
- De minimis rule: If 95% or more of the physical space of a property satisfies the integral part requirement when the property is placed in service, taxpayers may elect to treat the entire property as meeting the requirement.
- Integrated facilities rule: Multiple properties that operate as an integrated facility and are physically located or co-located on the same piece or contiguous pieces of land may be treated as a single unit of property for purposes of the integral part requirement. Aligning with the statute, the notice provides that any portion of property used for offices, administrative services, lodging, parking, research, software development, engineering or sales functions is ineligible for the special QPP deduction. In addition, subject to certain exceptions for consolidated groups and commonly controlled pass-through entities (e.g., partnerships or S corporations), leased property does not meet the integral part requirement, even if the lessee performs a QPA.
Grant Thornton insight:
Based on the unit of property definition, even upgrades or repairs that the taxpayer elects to capitalize as improvements to existing facilities may be QPP if the integrated facilities rule is used. This may offer taxpayers a more significant opportunity to take advantage of the depreciation allowance than if only ground-up builds are considered.
How we can help you
SERVICES
SERVICES
Qualified production activities
Notice 2026-16 provides much-anticipated guidance regarding activities that are QPAs. A QPA is the manufacturing, production, or refining of a qualified product that results in a substantial transformation of the property comprising the qualified product.
Substantial transformation of a qualified product
In general, substantial transformation of the property comprising a qualified product occurs upon the further manufacturing, production, or refining of the constituent elements, raw materials, inputs or subcomponents into a final, complete and distinct item of property that is fundamentally different from the original inputs. The notice provides examples of this substantial transformation requirement, such as the conversion of wood pulp to paper and steel rods to screws and bolts. In contrast, activities that do not result in a substantial transformation include grouping and packaging multiple finished goods (e.g., gift baskets).
Grant Thornton insight:
The definition of substantial transformation, including the examples provided in the notice, aligns with foreign base company income rules in Section 954(d) and Treas. Reg. §1.954-3.
As provided in the statute, a qualified product is tangible personal property but excludes food or beverage prepared in the same building as a retail establishment in which the property is sold (e.g., a restaurant). The notice further provides that tangible personal property has the same meaning as it does for purposes of the investment tax credit in Treas. Reg. §1.48-1(c), under which tangible personal property includes any tangible property except land, buildings, or other inherently permanent structures, as well as all property (other than structural components) contained in or attached to a building (e.g., production machinery).
Manufacturing, production & refining
The notice defines manufacturing, production, and refining under Section 168(n) and provides non-exhaustive examples of such activities. For qualifying property placed in service during 2025, a safe harbor allows taxpayers to evaluate these activities by reference to certain principal business activity codes uses on their most recently filed federal tax return.
- Manufacturing: Results in a material change in the form or function of tangible personal property, including parts and components, to create a new item of tangible personal property. A material change in the form or function occurs if, upon completion of the process, the inputs have been transformed such that they are distinguishable from, and cannot be readily returned to, their original state.
- Production: Either agricultural production or chemical production, defined as:
- Agricultural production: The process of cultivating the ground, including raising and harvesting crops and breeding livestock for sale, rent or lease. This does not include raising animals that are not livestock.
- Chemical production: A chemical process that formulates a product from organic and inorganic raw materials, including preparing raw materials for reaction, combining materials to form a new substance and purifying the final product. This may include manufacturing synthetic resins and plastics, manufacturing soaps or detergents and manufacturing pharmaceutical products.
- Refining: To purify a substance into a useful and higher-value product. For example, removing free fatty acids from animal fats, purifying nonferrous metals by electrolytic methods, processing vegetable oils to remove impurities and processing liquid natural gas.
Grant Thornton insight:
Collectively, the definitions of manufacturing, production, and refining are fairly broad and taxpayer-favorable. Some taxpayers, however, may need further clarification. For example, taxpayers that produce or manufacture certain building components (e.g., HVAC systems, sprinkler systems, drywall, restroom fixtures, etc.) appear to be excluded from the definition of manufacturing because they might not be manufacturing tangible personal property under the provided definitions (i.e., such property may be considered building property or structural components of a building).
Essential activities and related activities
Manufacturing, production, or refining activities that do not independently satisfy the substantial transformation requirement may constitute as a QPA if they are essential to the completion of a QPA. In addition, the notice provides a “related-activities” rule for employees that perform certain activities within an otherwise eligible property, such that the property will not become ineligible solely by reason of the activity.
- “Essential activities” include manufacturing, production, or refining activities that:
- Occur within the same property or integrated facility in which the substantial transformation occurs
- Do not occur within ineligible property (e.g., administration offices)
- Are necessary such that, without them, the substantial transformation either could not occur, would result in an end qualified product of a different quality than intended, or would result in a different quantity of qualified product than intended.
- “Related activities” occur within the same property or integrated facility in which the substantial transformation occurs and must not occur within ineligible property. Examples include:
- Oversight and direction of QPAs
- Material selection and vendor selection, or control of raw materials substantially transformed into a qualified product
- Management of costs or capacities attributable to QPAs (e.g., cost-reduction initiatives)
- Development of product design and design specifications, including intellectual property used in conducting a QPA
The notice further clarifies that the storage of raw materials used in a QPA may be an essential activity, whereas storage of finished products is not. In addition, taxpayers engaged in contract manufacturing may perform QPAs, provided the activities otherwise qualify.
Grant Thornton insight:
The “essential activities” and “related activities” rules are taxpayer-favorable guidance that may allow taxpayers to extend the special QPP deduction to portions of property where such activities are performed. However, both rules require essential activities and related activities be performed within the same property in which a substantial transformation occurs. Taxpayers should therefore evaluate and document whether reliance on the 95% de minimis election or the special rule for integrated facilities may be necessary to satisfy this requirement.
Allocation of unadjusted depreciable basis
The notice provides that a taxpayer may use any reasonable method to allocate a property’s unadjusted depreciable basis (as defined in Treas. Reg. §1.168(b)-1) between eligible property and ineligible property. Examples of reasonable methods include square footage, cost segregation studies, engineering plans and construction invoices. Taxpayers may use more than one reasonable allocation method, provided each allocation method is applied consistently.
Taxpayers also may use any reasonable allocation method to allocate the portion of basis attributable to dual-use infrastructure (e.g., central air conditioning system) that serves both eligible and ineligible property. Examples of reasonable methods include engineering plans, blueprints and process diagrams, provided the resulting allocation takes into account the actual or planned usage of the dual-use infrastructure.
Grant Thornton insight:
The notice’s acceptance of allocation methods such as square footage, cost segregation studies and engineering plans is a welcome development, as many taxpayers already rely on similar information for other tax calculations. However, while employee headcount may be viewed as a reasonable allocation method for certain purposes (e.g., under Section 263A), the notice explicitly states that headcount is not a reasonable method for allocating unadjusted depreciable basis to eligible property.
Once a taxpayer has determined the unadjusted depreciable basis properly allocable to eligible property, a taxpayer must designate the amount of such basis to be treated as QPP. This dollar-amount designation is made on a property-by-property basis. Amounts designated as QPP are treated as a separate class of property, and the taxpayer is treated as having made the applicable election(s) out of other special depreciation allowances (e.g., bonus depreciation under Section 168(k)) with respect to such property.
Manner of making a QPP election
Taxpayers make a QPP election for each person owning eligible property by attaching a statement to the timely filed (including extension) original federal tax return for the taxable year in which the eligible property is placed in service. The election statement must provide the taxpayer’s name, identification number and certain property-specific information, including:
- The property address and a description of the property and eligible property (if the property includes ineligible property)
- The total unadjusted depreciable basis of the property and the amount allocable to eligible property
- The portion of basis designated as QPP (which may be some, or all, of the property that is eligible to be QPP)
- A declaration that the taxpayer is applying the 95% de minimis rule, if applicable
Once made, the QPP may be revoked only with the Treasury Secretary’s consent by filing a private letter ruling request. Consent will be granted only in extraordinary circumstances and will not be provided where revocation would permit the use of hindsight.
Grant Thornton insight:
Consistent with certain depreciation or amortization elections, a QPP election does not appear to constitute a method of accounting. As a result, taxpayers looking to claim the special QPP deduction must complete the necessary analysis to identify QPP before the property is placed in service. This timing is important, as taxpayers may otherwise view the QPP analysis as analogous to a cost segregation study.
Unlike cost segregation, where taxpayers may be able to file an accounting method change to implement asset reclassifications after an asset is placed in service, the QPP election does not provide similar flexibility. Accordingly, taxpayers should exercise caution when coordinating QPP analyses with cost segregation studies.
10-year depreciation recapture
In general, taxpayers are required to recapture the portion of the special QPP deduction allocable to the portion of QPP that undergoes a QPP change in use in the taxable year in which the change occurs. Subject to certain special rules for consolidated groups and common controlled pass-through entities, a QPP change in use occurs if, at any time within the 10-calendar-year period beginning on the date the QPP is placed in service:
- The QPP ceases to satisfy the integral part requirement, and
- The QPP is used by the taxpayer in another productive use such that the property no longer qualifies as QPP.
A QPP change in use generally does not occur when QPP changes from being used in one QPA to another QPA. In addition, temporarily idle QPP does not undergo a QPP change in use, provided it is taken out of service only for a finite period and there is an expectation it will resume use in a QPA in the near future.
Grant Thornton insight:
Taxpayers would benefit from additional guidance regarding a QPP change in use. For example, the scope of “another productive use” remains unclear. In addition, a strict reading of the notice could suggest that even a single-day QPP change in use may trigger depreciation recapture. As a result, some taxpayers may benefit from an activity-based de minimis rule, similar to the integral part requirement 95% de minimis rule that is based on physical space.
Any portion of QPP that undergoes a QPP change in use constitutes disqualified property. Taxpayers determine the recomputed basis of disqualified property by multiplying the eligible property’s unadjusted depreciable basis designated as QPP by the percentage of the eligible property that underwent the change in use. That percentage may be determined using any reasonable method, provided the method is applied consistently to any subsequent partial changes in use with respect to the same eligible property.
Once a QPP change in use occurs, the excess of the recomputed basis over the adjusted basis of the disqualified property is treated as ordinary income in the year of change, in accordance with Section 1245(a)(1). The taxpayer then increases its basis in the disqualified property by the amount of ordinary income recognized.
The taxpayer is allowed a depreciation deduction for the disqualified property as though it was placed in service as a new separate asset on the first day of the taxable year in which the QPP change in use occurs, taking into account the applicable convention. Disqualified property is generally not eligible for special allowances, including a Section 179 deduction or bonus depreciation under Section 168(k).
Grant Thornton insight:
The tracking and information requirements necessary to comply with the 10-year recapture provisions are likely to be administratively burdensome for many taxpayers. Taxpayers that anticipate claiming the special QPP deduction should proactively review their tax depreciation records and software systems used to track assets to determine whether enhancements are needed to support compliance with these provisions.
Next steps
Notice 2026-16 provides helpful insight into the government’s interpretation of several key aspects of the special QPP deduction under Section 168(n) ahead of forthcoming proposed regulations. Taxpayers with property that may qualify for the deduction should review the notice carefully to understand how the government is currently interpreting this new provision.
Because reliance on the notice is optional and requires application of all its rules, taxpayers should evaluate whether reliance on the notice is appropriate based on their specific facts and circumstances, particularly with respect to definitions that incorporate rules from other provisions. Taxpayers should be aware that proposed regulations with rules consistent with the notice may be issued before the taxable year in which QPP is ultimately placed in service.
Contacts:
Washington, D.C.
Partner, Washington National Tax Office
Grant Thornton Advisors LLC
Ellen Martin is the national leader of Grant Thornton’s Strategic Federal Tax Services business line and is located in the metro Washington DC area.
Washington DC, Washington DC
Partner, Strategic Federal Tax Services
Grant Thornton Advisors LLC
David serves as the National Fixed Asset Leader for Grant Thornton's Strategic Federal Tax Services practice
Chicago, Illinois
Industries
- Construction & Real Estate
- Healthcare
- Manufacturing, Transportation & Distribution
- Retail & Consumer Brands
Service Experience
- Tax Services
National Tax Leader, Corporate Tax Solutions
Grant Thornton Advisors LLC
Chris Schenkenberg has extensive experience working in M&A, conducting tax due diligence reviews for both financial and strategic clients. He also has significant technical knowledge in acquisition structuring, divestiture planning and tax accounting methodologies.
Chicago, Illinois
Industries
- Manufacturing, Transportation & Distribution
- Technology, Media & Telecommunications
- Retail & Consumer Brands
Service Experience
- Tax Services
Content disclaimer
This Grant Thornton Advisors LLC content provides information and comments on current issues and developments. It is not a comprehensive analysis of the subject matter covered. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal, tax, or professional advice provided by Grant Thornton Advisors LLC. All relevant facts and circumstances, including the pertinent authoritative literature, need to be considered to arrive at conclusions that comply with matters addressed in this content.
Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms.
For additional information on topics covered in this content, contact a Grant Thornton Advisors LLC professional.
Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton Advisors LLC’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal, tax, or professional advice provided by Grant Thornton Advisors LLC. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact a Grant Thornton Advisors LLC tax professional. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein.
The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal, tax, or professional advice provided by Grant Thornton Advisors LLC. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact a Grant Thornton Advisors LLC tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information.
Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton Advisors LLC assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms.
Trending topics
Share with your network
Share