Tax Hot Topics
The Senate’s top two tax writers, Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, and Ranking Member Ron Wyden, D-Ore., have introduced legislation (S. 3931) to reform substantial parts of IRS customer service, tax administration, refund litigation and controversy management. The bill reflects bipartisan interest in improving IRS operations while strengthening taxpayer rights and increasing transparency and predictability in tax administration. If enacted, the provisions could also significantly alter refund claim strategy, forum selection, cash‑tax planning and controversy risk management for large partnerships and corporations.
Refund litigation
Under current law, taxpayers seeking to litigate refund disputes must file suit in a U.S. district court or the Court of Federal Claims after paying the tax at issue. The bill would allow taxpayers to bring certain refund disputes directly to the U.S. Tax Court.
Grant Thornton insight:
If enacted, this change would represent one of the most significant procedural shifts in refund litigation in decades. Access to the Tax Court could meaningfully affect litigation strategy, particularly for taxpayers accustomed to resolving deficiency disputes in that forum.
Refund claim determinations
Addressing longstanding concerns regarding refund claims remaining unresolved for extended periods, the bill would establish a statutory timeline for review. The IRS would generally have 12 months to issue a determination on a refund claim. If denying the claim, the agency would be required to provide a written explanation and information describing the taxpayer’s appeal rights.
IRS appeals
The legislation seeks to reinforce the principle that the IRS Independent Office of Appeals should evaluate disputes based on a hazards‑of‑litigation analysis. While the office has long applied this standard in practice, codifying the principle could be relevant in procedural disputes regarding access to Appeals or case transitions among the offices of Examination, Appeals, and Litigation.
The bill also includes provisions designed to increase the institutional independence of Appeals.
Penalty procedures
The proposal would authorize Treasury and the IRS to designate certain penalties that could be subject to procedures similar to deficiency procedures. If Treasury exercises this authority, affected penalties could potentially be challenged in Tax Court prior to payment, rather than under the traditional “pay first, litigate later” framework applicable to many assessable penalties.
Grant Thornton insight:
Depending on how broadly this authority is exercised if enacted, the provision could alter the economics and strategy of certain penalty disputes.
Administrative modernization
The bill proposes a series of administrative modernization measures, including:
- Expanded electronic filing and digitization of returns
- Enhanced “Where’s My Refund?” tools with clearer refund status information
- Greater functionality for IRS online accounts, including access for authorized representatives
- Expanded call‑back functionality to address extended phone wait times
Taxpayer protections
Additional provisions would strengthen standards applicable to paid tax return preparers and provide enhanced protections for victims of tax‑related fraud, including limitations on prolonged IRS scrutiny while fraud issues are being resolved.
Implications for large taxpayers
For large partnerships and corporations, the most significant aspects of the proposal are procedural rather than substantive. In particular:
- Forum selection: Access to the Tax Court for refund disputes could reshape litigation strategy and risk assessment.
- Timing and predictability: A statutory expectation for refund claim determinations introduces predictability that affects cash‑tax forecasting, financial statement reserves and liquidity management.
- Controversy management: Codification of Appeals standards and potential changes to penalty procedures may affect how disputes are resolved administratively versus through litigation.
Even without changes to underlying tax law, these procedural reforms could materially influence how taxpayers approach refund positions, penalty exposure and controversy planning.
Grant Thornton insight:
Taken as a whole, the proposed law reflects a clear policy objective to make the IRS more taxpayer- and practitioner-friendly while modernizing the IRS’s core administrative functions. It seeks to improve how issues are identified, communicated and resolved by emphasizing transparency, predictability, and timely action. The legislation signals a continued shift away from paper‑based processes and prolonged phone interactions and toward expanded digital tools, online account access and electronic communications for both taxpayers and their authorized representatives.
If enacted, these reforms would represent another step in bringing IRS administration into the modern era, with the potential to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of tax controversy resolution for taxpayers and the practitioners who represent them.
Contacts:
Content disclaimer
This content provides information and comments on current issues and developments from Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and Grant Thornton LLP. It is not a comprehensive analysis of the subject matter covered. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal, tax, or professional advice provided by Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and Grant Thornton LLP. All relevant facts and circumstances, including the pertinent authoritative literature, need to be considered to arrive at conclusions that comply with matters addressed in this content.
For additional information on topics covered in this content, contact a Grant Thornton professional.
Grant Thornton LLP and Grant Thornton Advisors LLC (and their respective subsidiary entities) practice as an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations and professional standards. Grant Thornton LLP is a licensed independent CPA firm that provides attest services to its clients, and Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and its subsidiary entities provide tax and business consulting services to their clients. Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms.
Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton Advisors LLC’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal, tax, or professional advice provided by Grant Thornton Advisors LLC. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact a Grant Thornton Advisors LLC tax professional. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein.
The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal, tax, or professional advice provided by Grant Thornton Advisors LLC. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact a Grant Thornton Advisors LLC tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information.
Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton Advisors LLC assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms.
Trending topics
Share with your network
Share