Search

Ways and Means weighs crypto tax reform

 

Tax Hot Topics

 

The House Ways and Means Committee held a hearing on June 9 focused on a bloc of six recently introduced bills that would reform the tax treatment of digital assets like cryptocurrencies and stablecoins in the U.S.

 

The bills are the latest in a yearslong string of legislative proposals aimed at overhauling how assets like bitcoin and ether are taxed, including a bipartisan effort by two committee members, Reps. Max Miller, R-Ohio, and Rep. Steven Horsford, D-Nev., put forward earlier this year. But this new wave of bills includes buy-in from the chair and Republican majority of the Ways and Means Committee, the first time the leadership of a taxwriting committee has put forward its own cryptocurrency proposals.

 

The bills are:

  • H.R. 9172 (PDF - 82.81KB), the Applying Existing Tax Anti-Abuse Rules to Digital Assets Act, introduced by Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas. The bill would apply wash and constructive sale rules to digital assets. The wash sale rule prevents traders from claiming a deduction for a security loss if they buy the same security within 30 days. The constructive sale rule applies to situations where an investment with unrealized gains is hedged so that the risk of loss is essentially eliminated.
    Estimates may differ now due to changes in cryptocurrency markets, but the Treasury Department’s 2024 “green book” of revenue proposals estimated that applying the wash sale rule to digital assets could raise $23.5 billion for the federal government over 10 years.
  • H.R. 9173 (PDF - 65.20KB), the Charitable Deductions for Digital Asset Donations Act, introduced by Rep. Mike Kelly, R-Pa. The bill would exempt digital asset donations from appraisal requirements, so long as the donated property meets criteria ensuring the value of the donation can be determined based on reliable market prices.
  • H.R. 9174 (PDF - 61.62KB), the Digital Assets Voluntary Disclosure Program Act, introduced by Rep. Aaron Bean, R-Fla. The bill would direct Treasury to create a voluntary disclosure program, with reduced penalties, for digital asset investors who may have underpaid taxes on their investments.
  • H.R. 9175 (PDF - 98.52KB), the Tax Clarity for Mining and Staking Act, introduced by Rep. Mike Casey, R-Ohio. The bill would treat cryptocurrency mining and staking rewards as ordinary income, but in a manner similar to self-created property, which can receive more favorable tax treatment upon sale.
  • H.R. 9176 (PDF - 85.68KB), the Providing Analogous Rules for Digital Assets (PAR) Act, introduced by Rep. David Kustoff, R-Tenn. The bill would allow digital asset dealers and traders to use mark-to-market accounting, similar to securities dealers and traders, allowing them to apply fair value to digital assets instead of the original purchase cost. The bill would also open the existing securities and commodities trading safe harbor for foreign individuals and corporations transacting in digital assets and allow digital asset owners to lend their assets without triggering a taxable event.
  • H.R. 9178 (PDF - 121.51KB), the Less Tax Paperwork for Digital Asset Owners Act, introduced by Rep. Rudy Yakym, R-Ind. The bill would create a new method of accounting for taxes on digital assets, adjust digital asset broker reporting requirements, and create special reporting exceptions for digital asset network fees.

Democrats also offered their own proposals, including amendments by Horsford to H.R. 9173 and H.R. 9715 that would limit elected deferrals on mining and staking rewards to a five-year window and limit charitable deductions to the amount a nonprofit receives upon sale of a digital asset. Most significantly, committee Democrats put forward a discussion draft aimed at increasing federal tax collection on digital assets sold by U.S. citizens in Puerto Rico, as the territory has become a hotbed for cryptocurrency investors and is subject to a more limited federal capital gains rate for non-U.S. citizens. 

 

Grant Thornton insight:

 

Passage of the bills into law this Congress would require a significant political breakthrough in the Senate. It is unlikely — though not impossible — that Republicans will use budget reconciliation, a special fast-track maneuver that allows revenue and spending legislation to advance in that chamber with a bare majority, rather than the typical 60-vote supermajority needed to end debate. Ways and Means Committee Chair Jason Smith, R-Mo., has said on numerous occasions that he will not seek to pass legislation in this area unless it has bipartisan support.

 

In regards to both tax treatment and an even higher industry priority, legislation to rewrite financial regulations for digital assets, congressional Democrats have voiced several policy concerns, including some specific to the involvement of President Donald Trump and his family in the industry. Those concerns represent a significant political hurdle for digital asset legislation to clear and become law during this Congress. However, taxwriting leaders in both parties have expressed optimism that this could be an area of bipartisan lawmaking in the foreseeable future.   

 
 

Contacts:

 

Washington DC, Washington DC

Service Experience

  • Tax Services
 
 

Content disclaimer

This content provides information and comments on current issues and developments from Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and Grant Thornton LLP. It is not a comprehensive analysis of the subject matter covered. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal, tax, or professional advice provided by Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and Grant Thornton LLP. All relevant facts and circumstances, including the pertinent authoritative literature, need to be considered to arrive at conclusions that comply with matters addressed in this content.

For additional information on topics covered in this content, contact a Grant Thornton professional.

Grant Thornton LLP and Grant Thornton Advisors LLC (and their respective subsidiary entities) practice as an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations and professional standards. Grant Thornton LLP is a licensed independent CPA firm that provides attest services to its clients, and Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and its subsidiary entities provide tax and business consulting services to their clients. Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms.

 

 

Tax professional standards statement

This content supports Grant Thornton Advisors LLC’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal, tax, or professional advice provided by Grant Thornton Advisors LLC. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact a Grant Thornton Advisors LLC tax professional. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal, tax, or professional advice provided by Grant Thornton Advisors LLC. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact a Grant Thornton Advisors LLC tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information.

 

Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton Advisors LLC assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms.

 

Trending topics