Tax Hot Topics
President Donald Trump ordered new tariffs on approximately $20 billion of imports from Canada, in a July 20 proclamation.
Trump invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930, also known as the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, for the first time in that law’s history. The new tariffs, which are at an ad valorem rate of 50% for covered items imported into the U.S., are set to take hold at 12:01 a.m. on Aug. 19. In ordering the tariffs, Trump cited Canadian tariffs imposed on U.S. automobiles, as well as Canadian retaliation against U.S. alcohol, which were put in place in response to broad tariffs on Canadian products Trump imposed last year.
The new tariffs exempt Canadian energy, potash (a fertilizer component), fish, imports already subject to Section 232 tariffs (steel, aluminum, copper, lumber, timber, derivative products of those materials, auto parts), and critical minerals.
Unlike the U.S. tariffs imposed on Canadian products last year (and then invalidated by a February 2026 Supreme Court ruling), these tariffs apply to goods normally exempt from duties by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), the update to the North American Free Trade Agreement that Trump pushed for and signed off on during his first term.
The Trump administration formally put the USMCA into an annual review process on July 1. This means the free trade agreement, which governs approximately $2 trillion in annual trade business imports and exports between the U.S., Canada and Mexico, is subject to possible change this year and every year moving forward until sunset in 2036, or unless a long-term agreement can be reached between the three governments.
Trump and senior administration officials have repeatedly said the U.S. could instead leave the USMCA, using an unusual provision that allows any country to leave the multilateral treaty with six months’ notice. In its stead they say they would pursue bilateral agreements with Mexico and Canada, with tariffs that could track along most-favored nation rates. This approach could increase long-term costs for businesses with supply chains that cross the Canadian or Mexican borders and possibly decrease U.S. export competitiveness. The White House estimates Canada’s retaliatory tariffs on automobiles cost U.S. manufacturers $5.6 billion over one year.
U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer signaled in recent congressional testimony that the administration will not maintain the current USMCA status quo, one way or the other.
“I’m hopeful that before the end of the year, we can have at least options for President Trump and the leaders of Canada and/or Mexico to consider potential interim arrangements, or things that Canada can do on the one hand, and Mexico can do on the other hand, to strengthen enforcement, to improve their commitments toward us, and to make sure that we're managing all of the trade issues," Greer told the Senate Finance Committee on July 22.
In his testimony Greer re-emphasized changes to rules of origin, the trade deficit with Mexico, and tightening of Mexican labor and environmental laws as priorities for the Trump administration in its negotiations. So far the USTR has formally engaged in USMCA-related talks with Mexico; though the U.S. Trade Representative and his Canadian counterparts have publicly described contact with each other in June and July.
Greer added that despite the latest trade volley between the U.S. and Canada, he was assured by the Canadian government that there would not be a further round of retaliation.
“They did not say that they're going to retaliate to what we're doing,” Greer told the Senate panel, describing a July 21 conversation with his Canadian counterpart, after concerns were raised about further escalation of trade tensions with one of the U.S.’s largest trade partners.
Domestic sentiment in Canada could rapidly change that calculus. Ontario Premier Doug Ford, a prominent member of Canada’s conservative party, said in a July 21 social media post that, “Team Canada needs to be united, standing up to President Trump and hitting back tariff for tariff until we get a fair trade deal.”
The Section 338 tariffs further increased trade and political tensions between Canada and the U.S. that have grown since Trump’s order to tariff Canadian products using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) in February 2025. However, the Aug. 19 implementation date gives time for de-escalation.
It is unclear whether the administration sees this as a necessary step in revising USMCA, or a warning shot towards leaving the agreement and creating frostier trade relations with Canada for the foreseeable future. Businesses should consider scenario planning for different outcomes, including heightened costs of imports from Canada and Mexico.
Contacts:
Content disclaimer
This content provides information and comments on current issues and developments from Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and Grant Thornton LLP. It is not a comprehensive analysis of the subject matter covered. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal, tax, or professional advice provided by Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and Grant Thornton LLP. All relevant facts and circumstances, including the pertinent authoritative literature, need to be considered to arrive at conclusions that comply with matters addressed in this content.
For additional information on topics covered in this content, contact a Grant Thornton professional.
Grant Thornton LLP and Grant Thornton Advisors LLC (and their respective subsidiary entities) practice as an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations and professional standards. Grant Thornton LLP is a licensed independent CPA firm that provides attest services to its clients, and Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and its subsidiary entities provide tax and business consulting services to their clients. Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms.
Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton Advisors LLC’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal, tax, or professional advice provided by Grant Thornton Advisors LLC. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact a Grant Thornton Advisors LLC tax professional. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein.
The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal, tax, or professional advice provided by Grant Thornton Advisors LLC. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact a Grant Thornton Advisors LLC tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information.
Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton Advisors LLC assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms.
Trending topics
Share with your network
Share