The United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit reversed the Tax Court’s decision in Farhy v. Commissioner (160 T.C. No. 6) on May 3, 2024, ruling on the IRS’s authority to assess penalties under Section 6038(b).
The petitioner, Alon Farhy, was required but failed to file Forms 5471 for two controlled foreign corporations. The Service assessed penalties for the failure to file the forms under Sections 6038(b)(1) (initial penalty) and (b)(2) (continuation penalty). In April 2023, the Tax Court ruled in favor of the taxpayer, holding that the Service lacked statutory authority to assess penalties under Section 6038(b) and instead must pursue the collection of such penalties through a civil action in court. (See our prior tax alert.)
On appeal, the D.C. Circuit has reversed the Tax Court’s decision, holding that the text, structure, and function of Section 6038 demonstrate that Congress authorized the assessment of penalties under Section 6038(b). The D.C. Circuit observed that Section 6038(c) also imposes a penalty in the form of a reduction to the foreign tax credit for failure to file information required under Section 6038(a). The D.C. Circuit stated there was no dispute that the penalty under subsection (c) was assessable, and that subsections (b) and (c) are coordinated. For instance, the subsection (c) penalty is reduced by any subsection (b) penalty when both penalties apply. The D.C. Circuit also reasoned those penalties under both subsections (b) and (c) are subject to a reasonable cause defense, and that former Section 6038(c)(4)(B) (as in effect during the tax years at issue) contemplated that the Service, rather than a court, first determine whether a taxpayer has demonstrated reasonable cause. Finally, the D.C. Circuit stated that the lack of a cross-reference to Chapter 68 (which provides express statutory authority for the assessment of penalties) or explicit language in Section 6038 that the penalty “shall be assessed” was not determinative, and that Congress could make a penalty assessable by implication.
The Golsen rule requires the Tax Court to follow circuit precedent when the appeal of a particular case would lie in that appellate circuit, even if the Tax Court might otherwise rule differently. See Golsen v. Commissioner, 54 T.C. 742 (1970), affirmed, 445 F.2d 985 (10th Cir. 1971). Appeals from the Tax Court go to the appellate circuit that has jurisdiction based on the taxpayer's residence or principal place of business. For taxpayers without a U.S. address, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has jurisdiction (see Section 7482(b)(1)(B)). Under the Golsen rule, the Tax Court will have to follow the D.C. Circuit’s decision in Farhy in cases appealable to the D.C. Circuit. The D.C. Circuit’s decision in Farhy is not controlling in Tax Court cases appealable to other circuits, but it could impact future decisions in other circuits and ultimately in the Tax Court.
Contact:
Content disclaimer
This content provides information and comments on current issues and developments from Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and Grant Thornton LLP. It is not a comprehensive analysis of the subject matter covered. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal, tax, or professional advice provided by Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and Grant Thornton LLP. All relevant facts and circumstances, including the pertinent authoritative literature, need to be considered to arrive at conclusions that comply with matters addressed in this content.
For additional information on topics covered in this content, contact a Grant Thornton professional.
Grant Thornton LLP and Grant Thornton Advisors LLC (and their respective subsidiary entities) practice as an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations and professional standards. Grant Thornton LLP is a licensed independent CPA firm that provides attest services to its clients, and Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and its subsidiary entities provide tax and business consulting services to their clients. Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms.
Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton Advisors LLC’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal, tax, or professional advice provided by Grant Thornton Advisors LLC. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact a Grant Thornton Advisors LLC tax professional. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein.
The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal, tax, or professional advice provided by Grant Thornton Advisors LLC. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact a Grant Thornton Advisors LLC tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton Advisors LLC assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms.
More tax hot topics
No Results Found. Please search again using different keywords and/or filters.
Share with your network
Share