Executive summary
Energy companies are navigating a complex mix of shifting commodity prices, trade policies and tariff pressures. To help maintain resilience, leaders have been turning to cost efficiency and operational agility. Companies need to guide that efficient agility with strategic planning that considers the latest incentives and risks. Then, companies need to empower action with scenario planning and technology transformation that drive smarter and faster decisions across the enterprise.
Continued uncertainty looms ahead. So, energy firms need to foster efficient agility that uses data to build a stable platform for growth in a market defined by constant change.
Efficiency versus volatility
Energy firms are used to volatility. The constant shifts in energy prices mean that leaders have learned to plan around change. However, today’s market environment demands even more agility.
“The struggle is that there are competing pressures,” said Grant Thornton Head of the Energy Industry Tyler Jones. “You have declining commodity prices that put pressure on margins, but you also have uncertainty on tariffs and what will happen with trade agreements.” With all of the issues they have to consider, it can be hard for companies to prioritize and plan.
Yet, many companies have adapted by building their core cost efficiency. “There’s a renewed focus on efficiency and cost containment which is paying dividends,” Jones said, saying that many companies have shown a decrease in the cost of energy production. “Over the last several quarters, there have been some sustained efficiencies from a cost perspective. So, that’s the balancing act that companies managed in 2025.”
To maintain that balance, companies need to monitor and understand the changing business pressures. Then, they need efficient agility to adapt quickly.
Monitor the pressures
Energy prices have recently been a challenge for many companies, Jones said. “What we’ve seen from a commodity pricing standpoint is that there’s been downward pressure on the published market price for oil, in particular, so that’s led to some reduced activity and a broader sensitivity to costs in general.”
Companies have been able to counter these cost pressures with efficient production, but trade issues could present another challenge. “The administration has indicated that they could withdraw from the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, USMCA,” said Colin Wilhelm, Manager, Legislative Affairs, Grant Thornton Washington National Tax Office. “Those are our two biggest trade partners — more than half the oil we import comes from Canada — so, it would have a significant impact if more trade barriers with those two countries go up or if we were to actually remove ourselves from USMCA.”
If the U.S. leaves the USMCA, the departure could come with tariff changes. The U.S. has tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico, but currently waives tariffs for anything that is compliant with the USMCA — which includes much of what the U.S. imports from the two countries. “If they were to renegotiate the USMCA, which it sounds like they will do — or leave — that could be significantly disruptive to a lot of supply chains,” Wilhelm said.
Tariffs are already a factor in construction and other projects for energy companies. “In the infrastructure space, you need steel and other manufactured products that are often sourced from overseas,” Jones said, but added that he hasn’t seen tariffs put a stop to most infrastructure plans. “The tariffs from 2025 have led to increased costs, and it’s had an impact, but we haven’t really seen tariffs alone change investment decisions for traditional energy companies.”
Renewable energy companies, on the other hand, have managed tariffs along with the sunsetting of renewable energy incentives. “Those companies have been hit harder, and I would expect that to continue in 2026.”
Beyond tariffs, global tensions could create other trade pressures. “The relationship with China feels like it could change on a weekly basis,” Wilhelm noted. Jones added, “The other two issues are instability in Russia and Ukraine — with Russia being a major gas producer for Europe — and then instability in the Middle East. Those two factors have historically been significant dominoes when it comes to OPEC and commodity pricing.”
Energy companies need to closely monitor these changing business pressures, and plan for the agility to adapt with all of the tools they have available.
Plan for agility
“Energy companies have been resilient, taking actions to improve cost efficiency and adjust operating models or defray tariff costs,” Jones said. To maintain their resilience, companies need to factor in some key opportunities and challenges.
Planning factors
Companies need to build agility with plans that factor in their potential tax incentives, supply chain strategies and market developments.
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) provides a range of incentives for energy customers, and these incentives can also help energy companies drive growth. “There are some major carrots as incentives for investment,” Wilhelm said.
The bill includes a return to 100% bonus depreciation, a more generous calculation of net interest deduction, and a revival of domestic R&D expensing. It also includes a new qualified production property temporary provision that allows for the expensing of structures involved in domestic manufacturing or production — which could include chemical production or other activities for energy companies.
Some provisions of the OBBBA, like the qualified production property provision, have deadlines for when activities must take place. So companies need to understand both the opportunities and their timing as leaders consider incentives in their capital allocation and scenario planning.
Tax incentives for domestic activity, along with tariff pressures, mean that “Companies should continue to evaluate nearshoring and look for vendor and supply arrangements that are based in the U.S.,” Jones said. “As tariffs continue in 2026, companies will continue to try to pull supplier relationships closer.”
Current pressures have already increased the competition for domestic business partners, but companies can analyze whether strategic options might fit their unique needs. “There’s no silver bullet, but some companies are looking at bonded warehouses, free trade areas and other strategies — there’s a variety of different strategies that will be company-specific,” Wilhelm said.
Scenario planning
All of these planning factors will continue to evolve, but they can be analyzed and managed. In a changing environment like this, data is the best resilience. With robust data, companies can build scenarios that illuminate options and inform decisions in advance.
Scenario planning is essential in an industry where the primary cash inflow driver is commodity pricing that fluctuates day-to-day. “Scenario planning has always been an important tactic for energy companies to exercise, and this has added another reason to do so,” Jones said. “Companies have been revisiting those scenarios to incorporate the impacts of tariffs, or the expected impact of tariffs, along with other potential factors.”
Wilhelm noted that, as planning factors have changed, the potential actions have changed as well. “With OBBBA, you have more actual action that can be taken. So, it’s not just scenario planning, but it’s also strategy adaptation to take advantage of what can help lessen some of the impacts on overall financials.”
Data-driven scenario planning can provide resilience, while data-driven technology transformation is empowering efficiency that gives many energy companies a stronger foundation for the future.
Tech transformation
AI and other emerging technologies have already driven targeted efficiencies and savings at many energy firms. Now, a growing number of companies are looking beyond these targeted gains to see how transformational capabilities can drive strategic enterprise-level returns.
Change can be expensive for traditional business and financial models. Constant changes have an even higher price tag. However, tech transformation can yield efficiencies that reduce costs and improve speed across business functions. Transformation can also empower processes that adapt quickly with precision, including the ability to test scenarios that weigh the complexities of potential decisions in advance.
Energy companies cannot know exactly how current market pressures will play out. But they can plan for the efficient agility that they are sure to need as change continues.
Contacts:
Head of Energy Industry
Grant Thornton Advisors LLC
Partner, Audit Services, Grant Thornton LLP
Tyler Jones serves as the Head of Energy Industry, and is an Audit Services partner in the Dallas office.
Dallas, Texas
Industries
- Energy
- Manufacturing, Transportation & Distribution
Service Experience
- Audit & Assurance Services
Manager, Tax Legislative Affairs Washington National Tax Office
Grant Thornton Advisors LLC
Content disclaimer
This Grant Thornton Advisors LLC content provides information and comments on current issues and developments. It is not a comprehensive analysis of the subject matter covered. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal, tax, or professional advice provided by Grant Thornton Advisors LLC. All relevant facts and circumstances, including the pertinent authoritative literature, need to be considered to arrive at conclusions that comply with matters addressed in this content.
Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms.
For additional information on topics covered in this content, contact a Grant Thornton Advisors LLC professional.
Trending topics
No Results Found. Please search again using different keywords and/or filters.
Share with your network
Share