Search

Ability to revoke 163(j) elections may benefit some taxpayers

 

Tax Hot Topics

 

The IRS released Revenue Procedure 2026‑17 (PDF - 187.68KB) on March 18, providing certain taxpayers a limited opportunity to withdraw certain elections previously made under Section 163(j). Taxpayers that previously made an election to be treated as an electing real property trade or business (RPTB), an electing farming business, or an excepted regulated utility trade or business, or that made a controlled foreign corporation (CFC) group election may wish to withdraw such elections following the statutory changes to the interest expense limitation regime enacted by last year’s tax law known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). 

 

Background

 

Section 163(j) generally limits the deduction for business interest expense to 30% of adjusted taxable income (ATI), plus business interest income and floor plan financing interest. Under the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, ATI was computed without regard to depreciation, amortization or depletion for taxable years beginning prior to Jan. 1, 2022 (i.e., ATI was close to a tax basis EBITDA). For all subsequent years, ATI took into account those deductions. (i.e., ATI was close to a tax-basis EBIT).

 

Certain trades or businesses are exempt from the interest expense limitation if they elect to be — specifically RPTBs and farming businesses. As a tradeoff for making the election, those companies must use the alternative depreciation system (ADS) to compute depreciation for nonresidential real property, residential rental property and qualified improvement property (QIP), which means that they are ineligible for bonus depreciation on QIP. RPTBs are often highly leveraged, so without this election, the interest expense limitation can be significant.

 

Interest expense allocable to an excepted regulated utility trade or business is not business interest expense subject to limitation. Taxpayers that make such an election cannot claim bonus depreciation on any property that is used in the excepted regulated utility trade or business.

 

Impact of the OBBBA

 

The change in law under the OBBBA may impact the analysis of whether to make these elections by:

  1. Restoring the depreciation and amortization addback to computing ATI for taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2024 (i.e., ATI will again be tax-basis EBITDA), and
  2. Making 100% bonus depreciation permanent for qualifying property acquired and placed in service after Jan. 19, 2025.

As a result, many taxpayers that previously made these elections may now find that the ability to claim bonus depreciation outweighs the benefit of avoiding the interest expense limitation.

 

Withdrawal of prior elections

 

Rev. Proc. 2026-17 permits certain taxpayers to withdraw a prior RPTB, electing farming business, or excepted regulated utility trade or business election for taxable years beginning in 2022, 2023 or 2024. To be eligible, a taxpayer must have originally made the election on a timely filed (including extensions) federal income tax return or Form 1065.

 

If the election is properly withdrawn:

  • The taxpayer is treated as if the election had never been made.
  • Taxable income, interest deductions, depreciation and basis must be recomputed for the affected year and all subsequent years impacted by the election.

To withdraw an election, an eligible taxpayer must file an amended federal income tax return on or before the earlier of Oct. 15, 2026, or the end of the applicable period of limitations on assessment for the taxable year for which the amended return is being filed (typically three years from filing). The taxpayer must attach a statement to the amended return for the affected year and all subsequent years that are required to be amended.

 

Partnerships subject to the centralized partnership audit regime enacted under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (BBA partnerships) may file an amended Form 1065 instead of an administrative adjustment request (AAR) if the BBA partnership filed a Form 1065 and furnished Schedules K-1 to its partners prior to the issuance of the revenue procedure for tax years beginning in 2022, 2023 or 2024.

 

The amended Form 1065 must be filed with the IRS and amended Schedules K-1 must be furnished to its partners by the earlier of the statute of limitations expiration date (typically three years from filing) or Oct. 15, 2026.

 

The AAR or amended Form 1065 may take into account tax changes provided by this revenue procedure and any other tax benefits to which the partnership is entitled by law. An eligible BBA partnership that receives an amended Schedule K-1 from another partnership can also file an amended Form 1065 pursuant to the revenue procedure.

 

Finally, taxpayers withdrawing one of these Section 163(j) elections may make a late election under Section 168(k)(7) to opt out of bonus depreciation for classes of property affected by the withdrawal. This provision is intended to mitigate unintended depreciation consequences resulting from retroactive recomputations.

 

Revocation of CFC group election

 

Similar to revoking the above elections, Rev. Proc. 2026-17 generally permits a taxpayer to revoke an existing CFC group election or make a new CFC group election for the first specified period of a specified group beginning after Dec. 31, 2024, without regard to the usual 60-month limitation in Treas. Reg. Section 1.163(j)-7(e)(5)(ii). This effectively gives multinational groups a one-time opportunity to revisit a prior CFC group decision in the post-OBBBA Section 163(j) environment, including the exclusion of Sections 951(a), 951A(a), and 78 inclusions from ATI.

 

Grant Thornton insight:

 

Rev. Proc. 2026-17 provides meaningful flexibility for taxpayers that made interest expense limitation elections under prior law. In light of the OBBBA’s restoration of depreciation addbacks, exclusion from ATI of certain international inclusions, and establishment of permanent bonus depreciation, eligible taxpayers should revisit prior elections to determine whether revoking such elections may provide greater tax planning opportunities.

 

In response to business’ arguments that the OBBBA exclusions undermine some of the value Congress intended to provide by restoring the more expansive tax incentive, Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.V.) and Rep. Ron Estes (R-Kan.) recently introduced legislation that would allow businesses to include their foreign income in the ATI base. The Ensuring Better Interest Treatment and Deductibility (EBITDA) Act (PDF - 26.65KB), rolled out March 26, would repeal the ATI limitation exclusion of global income.

 
 

Contacts:

 

Washington DC, Washington DC

 

Washington DC, Washington DC

Industries

  • Manufacturing, Transportation & Distribution
  • Technology
  • Private Equity

Service Experience

  • Tax Services
 

Washington, D.C.

 
 

Content disclaimer

This content provides information and comments on current issues and developments from Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and Grant Thornton LLP. It is not a comprehensive analysis of the subject matter covered. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal, tax, or professional advice provided by Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and Grant Thornton LLP. All relevant facts and circumstances, including the pertinent authoritative literature, need to be considered to arrive at conclusions that comply with matters addressed in this content.

For additional information on topics covered in this content, contact a Grant Thornton professional.

Grant Thornton LLP and Grant Thornton Advisors LLC (and their respective subsidiary entities) practice as an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations and professional standards. Grant Thornton LLP is a licensed independent CPA firm that provides attest services to its clients, and Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and its subsidiary entities provide tax and business consulting services to their clients. Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms.

 

 

Tax professional standards statement

This content supports Grant Thornton Advisors LLC’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal, tax, or professional advice provided by Grant Thornton Advisors LLC. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact a Grant Thornton Advisors LLC tax professional. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal, tax, or professional advice provided by Grant Thornton Advisors LLC. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact a Grant Thornton Advisors LLC tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information.

 

Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton Advisors LLC assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms.

 

Trending topics