Effort to ratify U.S. - Chile treaty grows


Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and key lobbying groups are ratcheting up pressure on the Senate to ratify the U.S. tax treaty with Chile. Schumer recently made a statement on the Senate floor urging ratification because Chile is a major producer of lithium and copper — key ingredients in electric vehicle batteries, solar cells, and wind turbines — all of which are a major focal point of various Green energy provisions passed as a part of last year’s Inflation Reduction Act.


Outside groups like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce are similarly urging ratification of the treaty, noting that a ratified treaty is necessary to avoid double taxation of American companies, and echoing Schumer’s statements on Chile’s production of key minerals and metals. Ratification also has the support of key Republicans such as Sen. Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.


The problem remains overcoming objections from key holdouts, and difference among Democrats and Republicans on where language is needed on foreign tax credits.


The U.S.-Chile treaty was originally signed in 2010 but languished for years unratified over objections from Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., along with tax treaties for Hungary and Poland and four tax treaty protocols. The Senate finally overcame Paul’s objections and ratified the four protocols in 2019, but the three treaties were held up due to complications arising from the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.


In March 2022, the treaty was approved by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, but it did not receive a full Senate floor vote. The treaty may need to be reported out by the committee again in the new Congress. Complicating the process is the potential that the treaty may need reservations — text or statements addressing non-compliance on certain provisions — to account for the enactment of the base-erosion and anti-abuse tax since the treaty was originally written. Proposed reservation language has been drafted, however.


Further complicating the process is a disagreement over treaty language relating to foreign tax credits. Some Senate Republicans are seeking a clarification in the treaty’s language to ensure companies will not face double taxation in certain circumstances while other lawmakers, like many top Senate Democrats, are pushing to get the treaty to the Senate floor as quickly as possible.


Treaty ratification would require a two-thirds vote in the Senate, though the treaty has generally enjoyed broad bipartisan support in recent history. Eighteen Republican senators wrote a letter urging approval of the treaty last December — though that was largely before the double taxation language became an issue. The main question is whether Senate leadership is willing to dictate the floor time necessary to overcome objections from Paul and other Republicans, which could significantly drag out the process.


U.S.-headquartered businesses with operations in, or exposure to, Chile should consider engaging with policymakers to urge ratification of the treaty.




Tax professional standards statement

This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “§,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.


More tax hot topics