The final revenue recognition regulations (TD 9941
) under Section 451 both provide guidance to accrual-method taxpayers required to accelerate income under the new rules and also give taxpayers opportunities to defer the recognition of revenue under a variety of circumstances. The regulations are required to be implemented for the first tax year beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2021, but taxpayers may implement these regulations early and avail themselves of their benefits early. The IRS recently released procedures for changing methods of accounting to comply with the final rules, and they must be applied for all Forms 3115 filed on or after Aug. 12, 2021.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), in conjunction with the recent adoption of ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers
, often changes the timing of income inclusion for accrual method taxpayers with applicable financial statements (AFS).1
Practitioners, through numerous comment letters and informal discussions, requested relief from some of the scenarios in the proposed regulations that result in accelerated taxable income. The final regulations provide some of the requested relief, along with increased clarity around the revenue required to be accelerated for tax purposes, sought by taxpayers.
Two of the most significant opportunities contained in the final regulations relate to contractual enforceable right provisions and optional cost offsets. Under the enforceable right rules, taxpayers may exclude from income amounts to which the taxpayer does not have an enforceable right to recover if the taxpayer’s customer terminates the contract to which the income relates on the last day of the taxable year. Additionally, pursuant to the cost offset method, taxpayers may reduce income attributable to the future sale of inventory that is otherwise required to be accelerated under the AFS income inclusion rule discussed below.
Grant Thornton Insight: All taxpayers must consider the impact the new regulations will have on computing taxable income in 2021. However, some taxpayers could see substantial benefits by early application of the regulations on a taxpayer’s income tax return for a year beginning before Jan. 1, 2021. Such taxpayers must possess the time and resources to perform a detailed analysis and proper, thoughtful implementation prior to their return filing as the ability to file subsequent automatic method changes may be limited.
The adoption of ASC 606 can change the timing of revenue recognition for contracts with customers as the requirements for revenue recognition under ASC 606 are different from the recognition requirements under previous GAAP.
Under Section 451(a) and Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.451-1(a), gross income generally includes any amount received in a tax year, unless such amount is properly accounted for in a different period under the taxpayer’s method of accounting.
Prior to the TCJA’s enactment, accrual-method taxpayers recognized revenue in the taxable year in which (1) all the events have occurred that fix the right to receive income, and (2) the income could be determined with reasonable accuracy (the “all-events test”). Further, a fixed right to receive income under the all-events test was generally satisfied upon the earliest date when such income was earned, due, or received by the taxpayer.
The TCJA added a new Section 451(b) that requires taxpayers to follow the all-events test as long as they recognize income no later than when it is recognized in their AFS (the “income inclusion rule”). This new rule may accelerate income to a year earlier than it would have been recognized under the all-events test for many taxpayers with AFS.
Grant Thornton Insight: In general, taxpayers must now recognize income upon the earliest of when such income is due, earned, received or reported in the taxpayer’s AFS.
The TCJA also created new Section 451(c), which codified and modified guidance (Rev. Proc. 2004-34) giving taxpayers the option to include advance payments in income in the year of receipt or defer a portion for eligible items to the subsequent year.
The final regulations under Section 451 are generally applicable to tax years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2021, however, taxpayers may choose to apply the final regulations to a tax year beginning after Dec. 31, 2017, provided they are applied in their entirety and in a consistent manner to such tax year and all subsequent taxable years. However, taxpayers are generally not allowed to include a method change on an amended return. As discussed later, the current method change procedures do not provide taxpayers with the ability to apply the final regulations to any tax year that has already been filed, for example, by allowing method changes on amended returns.
Grant Thornton Insight: The scope limitation that would generally disallow automatic method changes for any item a taxpayer changed within the prior five years is temporarily inapplicable for certain method changes made under the proposed regulations for a taxpayer’s first, second or third taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2017, and to changes made under the final regulations for a taxpayer’s first year beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2021, or early application year, as discussed below. Accordingly, taxpayers may be able to develop tax planning involving multiple automatic method changes that occur during the 2020 and 2021 tax years.
While the TCJA effectively provides that a taxpayer’s satisfaction of the all-events test may be accelerated via the income inclusion rule, it should be noted that such rule does not apply to taxpayers without an AFS. Further, under statutory exceptions, the income inclusion rule does not apply to an item of gross income earned in connection with a mortgage servicing contract or any item of gross income subject to a special method of accounting (as discussed below).
Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.451-3
Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.451-3 provides guidance for taxpayers complying with the new provisions contained in Section 451(b). Although the regulation provides much in the way of direction, perhaps the most significant areas addressed relate to (i) required and optional adjustments to AFS revenue for purposes of applying the income inclusion rule and (ii) the allocation of the transaction price to revenue streams containing multiple performance obligations.
AFS revenue and related adjustments
Section 451(b) generally requires that the all-events test be considered satisfied no later than when an item of income is reflected as revenue in a taxpayer’s AFS. The statute applies the acceleration rule to each item of “gross income”; however, the regulations apply the acceleration rule to gross receipts and do not allow an acceleration of any related cost of goods sold. As such, understanding the revenue reflected in an AFS becomes extremely important for purposes of applying Section 451(b). The regulations go into a great deal of detail in defining an AFS and the related revenue adjustments that can or must be made for tax purposes.
The final regulations define AFS and provide ordering rules that require a taxpayer to use the financial statement with the highest priority. Such financial statements include GAAP and IFRS statements included in a Form 10-K filed with the SEC or foreign equivalent, a GAAP or IFRS audited financial statement used for credit, reporting or non-tax purposes, or other statements (other than a tax return) filed with a federal, state, or foreign governmental agency.
AFS revenue includes all items of revenue, but not net of any related costs, reported in the taxpayer’s AFS. However, such revenue is not limited solely to amounts included in the income statement. Other revenue items may be captured elsewhere in the AFS (e.g.
, in retained earnings and other comprehensive income), and must be included in AFS revenue.
Enforceable right to recover
Section 61(a) provides a statutory definition of gross income that includes income realized in any form—whether money, property, or services. The regulations under Section 61 provide that taxpayers should look to Section 451 for the general rules as to when an item is included in gross income (i.e.
, the taxable year).
This statutory construction was acknowledged in footnote 872 to the Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference, which provided that new Section 451(b) “does not revise the rules associated with when an item is realized for Federal income tax purposes and, accordingly, does not require the recognition of income in situations where the Federal income tax realization event has not yet occurred.”2
The Conference Report, which summarized current law, further emphasized the importance of first ascertaining whether a taxpayer was in receipt of an item of gross income before turning to Section 451 to determine the timing of when that item is included in gross income. Thus, Section 451(b) is inapplicable in situations where realization has not occurred.
Treasury declined to provide a definition for the term “realization” in the final regulations, but instead offered that the concept of realization is a factual determination that has different meanings in different contexts. The preamble did indicate, however, that the government believes “it is reasonable to conclude that Congress intended a different concept of realization that would give full effect to the statute.” Therefore, taxpayers should be mindful of their particular facts and circumstances to determine if a realization event has occurred prior to the application of Section 451(b).
Although Treasury did not define “realization,” the final regulations did offer the concept of an “enforceable right,” which may be viewed as a subset of “realization.” The final regulations provide that in determining when an item of gross income is “taken into account as AFS revenue,” AFS revenue is reduced by amounts that the taxpayer does not have an enforceable right to recover if the customer
were to terminate the contract on the last day of the taxable year. The determination of whether the taxpayer has an enforceable right is governed by the contract and applicable federal, state or international law.
The application of the enforceable right provision is highly factual in nature. As such, taxpayers should possess a thorough understanding of the facts surrounding a transaction as well as how federal, state, or international law is applied to the contractual terms of that transaction. Accordingly, an enforceable right analysis can prove burdensome and time-consuming for taxpayers.
In light of the potential complexities involved in performing an enforceable right analysis, Treasury provided taxpayers with the ability to simplify the analysis by way of the “Alternative AFS Revenue Method.” Under the Alternative AFS Revenue Method, a taxpayer does not reduce AFS revenue by amounts that the taxpayer lacks an enforceable right to recover. Rather, the taxpayer generally reports income in an amount equal to that reported on the AFS. The result is a potential acceleration of revenue recognition in exchange for a reduction in contract analysis.
The Alternative AFS Revenue Method is a method of accounting and must be applied to all items of gross income in the trade or business that are subject to the AFS Income Inclusion Rule. Both the general rule and the alternative rule are methods of accounting that must be applied consistently and cannot be changed without consent of the Commissioner.
Grant Thornton Insight: Even though not defined in the final regulations, taxpayers should examine their circumstances to determine if a realization event has occurred. The absence of a realization event, or the lack of an enforceable right, may allow taxpayers to avoid accelerated revenue recognition otherwise required under the AFS income inclusion rule. However, taxpayers should be mindful that the IRS indicated in the preamble that Congress may have changed the concept of realization by modifying the statute, which could lead to uncertainty and future controversy.
Additional adjustments to AFS income
The final regulations provide the following mandatory adjustments to AFS revenue to determine when an item of gross income is “taken into account as AFS revenue” for purposes of the AFS Income Inclusion Rule and Alternative AFS Revenue Method:
Cost offset to AFS revenue
- AFS revenue must be increased by any book reductions attributable to cost of goods sold (COGS) and liabilities required to be accounted for under other provisions such as Section 461—including rebates, refunds, chargebacks, allowances, and rewards.
- AFS revenue must be increased for any reduction for amounts anticipated to be in dispute or uncollectable (but see Rev. Rul. 2003-10).
- AFS revenue must be decreased by amounts attributable to book increases in the transaction price resulting from a significant financing component.
Under ASC 606, when certain criteria for revenue recognition are met, revenue for the production of goods is recognized over time instead of at a point in time. When those criteria are met, an entity will recognize revenue and the related production costs over time as the entity produces the goods, which results in revenue (and costs) being recognized earlier than under previous GAAP. Under the prior financial statement guidance revenue and the related production costs for the goods would not be recognized until the goods had been delivered to the customer.
Pursuant to the AFS income inclusion rule, tax recognition of this production income is accelerated such that tax revenue recognition will match book revenue recognition. However, the related COGS may not be accelerated for tax purposes under the principles contained in Sections 446, 461, 471, and 263A. As a result, there can be a mismatch of revenue and COGS for tax purposes. In response to taxpayer concerns over this potential mismatch, Treasury provided the cost offset method in the final regulations.
Grant Thornton Insight: Prior to consideration of the cost offset method, taxpayers should examine their contracts to determine if they have eligible long-term contracts required to be properly accounted for under Section 460 and the percentage of completion method.
The final regulations do not provide an accelerated deduction under the provisions of Sections 461, 471, and 263A when goods are produced over a period of time and an amount is accelerated into income under the AFS Income Inclusion Rule. Instead, the final regulations allow a taxpayer to reduce a portion of the revenue it would otherwise be required to include under the AFS Income Inclusion Rule by a new safe harbor referred to as the "cost of goods in progress offset." The safe harbor option only applies to sale of items of inventory and does not include costs associated with other revenue streams (e.g.
, accelerated deductions related to rewards programs). This optional safe harbor reduction is referred to in the final regulations as an “AFS cost-offset method” and is discussed in further detail below.
The AFS cost offset method does not modify the rules for determining when costs are allocated to and included in inventory under Sections 461, 471, and 263A. Therefore, the AFS cost-offset method applies only to reduce the amount of income included under the AFS income inclusion rule. Costs allocated to inventory will continue to be recovered through COGS in the year they are treated as sold in accordance with the taxpayer’s inventory cost flow assumption.
Under the AFS cost-offset method, a taxpayer may reduce gross income includible for a year prior to the year in which ownership of inventory transfers to the customer by reducing the amount of revenue it would otherwise be required to include under the AFS income inclusion rule by the “cost of goods in progress offset.”
The cost of goods in progress offset for each item of inventory in the taxable year is calculated as (1) the cost of goods incurred through the last day of the taxable year, (2) reduced by the cumulative cost of goods in progress offset amounts attributable to the item of inventory that were taken into account in prior taxable years, if any. The cost of goods in progress amount is determined for each item of inventory by applying the taxpayer’s methods of accounting used for federal income tax purposes, including Sections 263A and 471. However, the cost of goods in progress offset cannot reduce the AFS inventory inclusion amount for the item of inventory below zero.
A taxpayer that defers revenue prior to the sale under the AFS cost-offset method will generally include that revenue in the tax year in which ownership of the item of inventory is transferred to the customer.
Facts: In 2021, A enters into a $100 contract to manufacture and deliver a good in 2022. With respect to the manufacturing process, A incurs $12 of costs in 2021 and $48 of costs in 2022. The total of these costs ($60) is capitalized under Sections 263A and 471. A’s AFS income inclusion amount is $20 for 2021.
2021 tax implications: A reduces the $20 AFS inclusion amount by the $12 cost of goods in progress offset which results in the recognition of $8 of revenue for 2021. A is entitled to no COGS deduction in 2021 because A retains title to the good in 2021.
2022 tax implications: A receives $100 upon delivery of the good in 2022. This amount is reduced by the prior (2021) inclusion amount of $8 which results in the recognition of $92 of revenue in 2022. A is entitled to a $60 COGS deduction in 2022 as ownership of the good passed to A’s customer in 2022. The result to A in 2022 is gross income of $32.
The AFS cost-offset method is a method of accounting that must be applied to all items of income eligible for the method in the taxpayer’s trade or business. In addition, a taxpayer using the AFS cost-offset method must also use the advance payment cost offset method under Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.451-8(e).
As evidenced by the foregoing discussion, the cost-offset method may be a labor-intensive process requiring taxpayers to run a series of complicated computations involving significant data demands. Therefore, Treasury made the application of this method optional, as taxpayers are permitted to recognize income under the AFS income inclusion rule without the benefit of a cost offset. However, the convenience associated with not utilizing the cost-offset method will result in accelerated revenue recognition for taxpayers.
Grant Thornton Insight: Application of the cost-offset method may require taxpayers to develop and implement additional accounting systems to track the data required to properly compute annual cost offsets. Use of the cost-offset method is optional. Some taxpayers may wish to delay implementation of this method until future years if they are looking to increase revenue recognition in tax year with lower income tax rates. Taxpayers wishing to avail themselves of this opportunity should review their facts in conjunction with the five-year scope limitation and scope limitation waiver to understand when they may properly implement the cost-offset method using automatic procedures and when nonautomatic procedures would be required.
Exclusions from the AFS Inclusion Rule
Pursuant to Teas. Reg. Sec. 1.451-3(b)(3), the following items are excluded from application of the AFS income inclusion rule:
- Items of gross income utilizing a special method of accounting to determine timing
- Items of gross income incurred in connection with a mortgage servicing contract
- Any taxable year that is not covered entirely by one or more AFS
A special method of accounting under Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.451-3 is defined as a method of accounting either expressly permitted or required under the Code, regulations, or other published guidance that includes items of gross income in a taxable year not determined by the all-events test. Some examples of special methods of accounting include installment sales under Section 453, long-term contracts under Section 460, short-term obligations under Sections 1281 through 1283, and the mark-to-market method under Section 475.
Allocation of transaction price
A performance obligation is defined by the final regulations as a promise in a contract with a customer to transfer to the customer a distinct good, service, or right (or combination thereof). The regulations further provide that separate performance obligations are identified by applying the accounting standards the taxpayer uses to prepare its AFS.
As an example, consider a contract for the sale of a widget. Under the terms of the contract the purchaser receives a widget, a warranty, and technical support. It is possible that the widget, the warranty, and the technical support may all be considered separate performance obligations within the contract (i.e.
, a single contract with multiple performance obligations).
Treas. Reg. Secs. 1.451-3(d) and 1.451-8(c)(8) create a conformity requirement with respect to contracts containing multiple performance obligations. Under this rule, if the taxpayer must allocate a contract’s transaction price among multiple performance obligations for financial statement purposes, the taxpayer must also make the same allocation among the same performance obligations for tax purposes.
Mandating the same allocations of transaction price to performance obligations for tax purposes promotes accuracy in matching the book inclusions for specific items of revenue with the corresponding gross income required to be analyzed for tax. However, it should be noted that this matching does not require a recharacterization of a transaction for tax purposes (e.g.
, a tax sale will not be treated as a lease solely due to financial statement treatment of the transaction as a lease).
The final regulations also clarify that each separate performance obligation for financial reporting purposes yields an item of gross income for tax purposes that must be accounted for separately under the AFS Income Inclusion Rule. However, there may be single performance obligations for financial reporting purposes that yield multiple items of gross income for tax purposes.
Grant Thornton Insight: The IRS historically has not provided much guidance to assist taxpayers in defining an item (of income or expense) for tax purposes. The final regulations appear to reverse this trend by indicating that all performance obligations are items (or need to be subdivided into additional items) for tax purposes.
The final regulations provide that if a contract with a customer includes items of gross income subject to a special method of accounting (e.g.
, long term contracts under Section 460) and other items of gross income, the transaction price is first allocated to items of gross income subject to a special method of accounting, with the residual amount allocated to the other items of gross income. Prior to such allocation, AFS adjustments (as detailed in the “Additional adjustments to AFS income” sub-section above) must be evaluated and implemented.
Prior to the release of Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.451-8, Rev. Proc. 2004-34 provided guidance for accrual taxpayers that received certain advance payments for the provision of goods, services, or other specified items. This revenue procedure provided accrual method taxpayers with the option to either include advance payments in income in the year of receipt (the “full inclusion method”) or to defer a portion of the advance payments to the subsequent year for eligible items (the “deferral method”).
The TCJA provided taxpayers with Section 451(c), which is essentially a codified and modified version of Rev. Proc. 2004-34. Pursuant to Section 451(c)(4), an advance payment is defined as a payment that (i) may permissibly be included in income on the year of receipt, (ii) a portion of the payment is included in AFS revenue in a year subsequent to the year of receipt, and (iii) the payment is for goods, services or other specified items. Such advance payments may be accounted for either under the full inclusion method or the deferral method.
Notice 2018-35 allowed taxpayers to continue to rely on Rev. Proc. 2004-34 until further guidance was issued. As such, taxpayers had the ability to defer recognition of advance payments under both Section 451(c) and Rev. Proc. 2004-34. The final regulations obsolete Rev. Proc. 2004-34 and Notice 2018-35 for tax years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2021.
Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.451-5, prior to its revocation, previously allowed accrual method taxpayers to defer the inclusion of income for advance payments for goods for periods in excess of those permitted under Rev. Proc. 2004-34. However, Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.451-5 was not included in the final regulations and those deferral provisions are, accordingly, no longer applicable.3
Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.451-8
Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.451-8 codifies and modifies Rev. Proc. 2004-34 such that certain advance payments are eligible for the deferral method of accounting. To qualify as an advance payment, the payment must be eligible to be included in income in the year of receipt and all or a portion of the payment must be reflected in the taxpayer’s AFS in a year subsequent to the year of receipt. The regulation broadens the list provided in the statute to include payments for items such as goods, services, the use of intellectual property, computer software, eligible gift cards, certain warranty contracts, subscriptions, memberships and the occupancy or use of property ancillary to the provision of services.
Similar to Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.451-3, the final regulations state that if a taxpayer allocates a contract’s transaction price among multiple performance obligations for financial statement purposes, the taxpayer must also make the same allocation among the same performance obligations for tax purposes. Pursuant to this rule, each performance obligation, or item for tax purposes, may be eligible to use the deferral method of accounting as described in Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.451-8. Accordingly, taxpayers may need to perform additional analysis to determine the proper treatment of items for which an advance payment is received.
Grant Thornton Insight: Additional deferral opportunities are likely to exist due to the interaction between the financial accounting rules and the final regulations. For example, taxpayers offering loyalty programs may have a portion of their sales price allocated as a separate performance obligation to the loyalty points provided to a customer under the program. The regulations indicate that such an allocation may result in a deferral opportunity for the loyalty program revenue. However, credit card reward programs are ineligible for such deferral.
The deferral method is not limited to taxpayers with AFS. Similar to Rev. Proc. 2004-34, the final regulation provides a deferral method for taxpayers without AFS (the non-AFS deferral method). Taxpayers using the non-AFS deferral method include advance payments in revenue in the year of receipt, to the extent the payment is earned (which is different from the deferral method that requires inclusion to the extent included in a taxpayer’s AFS), and the remainder is included in the subsequent period. Without the regulations, taxpayers that don’t have AFS were at risk of not being allowed to use the deferral method for advance payments for tax years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2021, because Rev. Proc. 2004-34 was obsoleted as of that date and Section 451(c) only allows taxpayers with AFS to use the deferral method.
The proposed regulations excluded specified goods from the definition of “advance payments.” The regulations provided that the definition of an advance payment generally does not include a payment received in a tax year which precedes the contractual delivery date for a specified good by two or more years. A “specified good” is defined as a good for which (i) the taxpayer does not have available, in the year the advance payment is received, goods of a substantially similar kind and in a sufficient quality to satisfy the contract and (ii) all the revenue from the sale of the good is recognized in AFS in the year of delivery. Thus, advance payments for specified goods were required to be analyzed under Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.451-3.
The final regulations generally retain the specified good exception contained in the proposed regulations, thereby requiring analysis under Treas. Reg. Section 1.451-3. However, under the final regulations, taxpayers have the option to treat an otherwise qualifying payment for a specified good as an advance payment and apply the deferral provisions of Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.451-8.
Advance payment cost offsets
As discussed in detail above, certain types of transactions involving the production of goods over a period of time may result in an acceleration of the recognition of income—and the related production costs—for financial statement purposes. Pursuant to the AFS income inclusion rule, tax recognition of this production income is accelerated such that tax revenue recognition will match book revenue recognition. However, the related COGS may not be accelerated for tax purposes under the principles contained in Sections 461, 471, and 263A.
Similar to the AFS cost offset method discussed above, the final regulations provide taxpayers using the full inclusion or deferral methods for advance payments with a degree of relief through the advance payment cost offset method. Taxpayers using the advance payment cost offset method must apply this method to all items of income eligible for the method in the taxpayer’s trade or business. Further, taxpayers using the AFS cost offset method must use the method, where applicable, under both Treas. Reg. Secs. 1.451-3 and 1.451-8.
Grant Thornton Insight: Prior to the final regulations, Rev. Proc. 2004-34 did not provide for a cost offset and deferral was limited to a one-year period. Application of the advance payment cost-offset method, in conjunction with the deferral method may allow taxpayers to achieve deferrals in excess of one year. Taxpayers—especially those previously utilizing repealed Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.451-5—should consider exploring the potential opportunities.
Mismatched reportable periods
The final regulations clarify issues caused by mismatched financial accounting and tax years. When such a mismatch occurs, three methods are provided so that taxpayers can properly determine the AFS inclusion amount for a particular tax year.
In the first method, the taxpayer computes AFS revenue as if its financial reporting period is the same as its taxable year by conducting an interim closing of its books using the accounting principles it uses to prepare its AFS.
Under the second method, the taxpayer computes AFS revenue by including a pro rata portion of AFS revenue for each financial accounting year that includes any part of the taxpayer's taxable year. If the taxpayer's AFS for part of the taxable year is not available by the due date of the return (with extension), the taxpayer must make a reasonable estimate of AFS revenue for the pro rata portion of the taxable year for which an AFS is not yet available.
If a taxpayer's financial accounting year ends five or more months after the end of its taxable year, the taxpayer is provided with a third alternative. Under this methodology, the taxpayer computes AFS revenue for the taxable year based on the AFS revenue reported on the AFS prepared for the financial accounting year ending within the taxpayer's taxable year. If a taxpayer uses a 52- or 53-week year for financial accounting or federal income tax purposes, the last day of such year is deemed to occur on the last day of the calendar month ending closest to the end of such year.
Grant Thornton Insight: Taxpayers should consider the three alternatives in conjunction with their available data and data processing capabilities in order to determine a manageable computation methodology as well as a preferable tax result. It should be noted that the selection of a methodology is a method of accounting which must be applied consistently in subsequent years.
Rev. Proc. 2021-34
The IRS released Rev. Proc. 2021-34,4
which modifies Rev. Proc. 2019-43 to provide procedures under Section 446 and Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.446-1(e) to obtain automatic consent from the IRS to change methods of accounting to comply with the final revenue recognition regulations.
The procedure itself is over 70 pages in length and contains extensive details relating to the multiple method changes available, concurrent filings, streamlined change procedures, audit protection, netting of Section 481(a) adjustments, and limited waivers of the five-year method change scope limitation under Section 5.01(f) of Rev. Proc. 2015-13. As such, taxpayers must carefully examine the Rev. Proc. for proper implementation of the final regulations because there are many nuances that create the possibility for technical foot faults in its application.
Some of the more significant procedural rules include the following:
Grant Thornton Insight: The five-year limitation, with respect to application of the proposed regulations, is waived for the first, second, or third taxable year beginning after Dec. 31, 2017. As such, taxpayers may have the ability to make an accounting method change under the proposed regulations for 2020 and then a subsequent method change under the final regulations for 2021.
Grant Thornton Insight: Taxpayers should be careful not to inadvertently adopt certain revenue recognition changes through the streamlined change procedures when filing their 2020 federal income tax return, as this could potentially prevent the taxpayer from making a change for the same item in 2021.
- Rev. Proc. 2021-34 is effective as of Aug. 12, 2021. Therefore, all Forms 3115 filed with the IRS on or after this date must comply with the provisions of the revenue procedure.
- Although the final regulations provide that they may be applied to taxable years beginning after Dec. 31, 2017, the revenue procedure only provides rules for the filing of Forms 3115 and is silent on the filing of an amended federal income tax return. As such, the final regulations may only be applied on returns which have not yet been filed (i.e., 2020 returns or later).
- Audit protection is generally provided for all Forms 3115 filed under the Rev. Proc. However, taxpayers using the streamlined change procedures approach in which no Form 3115 is filed will not receive audit protection.
- The five-year limitation under Section 5.01(f) of Rev. Proc. 2013-13 (which limits a taxpayer’s ability to make automatic method changes if the taxpayer made a change for the same item in the prior five years) is waived for a taxpayer’s early application year or, if no early application, for the taxpayer’s first taxable year beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2021. Thus, it appears that the five-year waiver may only be used once by a taxpayer when applying the final regulations.
- The revenue procedure provides for streamlined implementation of certain methods provided in the final regulations that have a zero Section 481(a) adjustment. Such a change does not require a taxpayer to complete and attach a Form 3115 or statement to the tax return, but also does not provide audit protection.
Rev. Proc. 2021-34 is extremely detailed and nuanced. As an initial step, taxpayers may wish to review this chart, which summarizes several of the more significant revenue recognition accounting method changes along with some of the related procedural requirements for each method change.
The final revenue recognition regulations, along with the companion procedural guidance, provide taxpayers with many opportunities—as well as many implementation hurdles. Taxpayers should perform a detailed analysis to determine how to properly apply the new rules which are complex from both a technical and procedural perspective. Taxpayers may also wish to determine a preference for tax benefits or administrative ease, as these options are often mutually exclusive in these rules.
In addition, the final regulations are effective for tax years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2021, (with early implementation options) and the procedural guidance is currently effective. Thus, taxpayers should think through their implementation strategy as early as possible given the complexities and intricacies involved.
For more information, contact:
Washington National Tax Office
Grant Thornton LLP
+1 202 861 4140
Washington National Tax Office
Grant Thornton LLP
+1 732 516 5539
Washington National Tax Office
Grant Thornton LLP
+1 202 861 4147
Washington National Tax Office
Grant Thornton LLP
+1 202 521 1523
Washington National Tax Office
Grant Thornton LLP
+1 202 521 1555
To learn more visit gt.com/tax
Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.
The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.