Tax legislative roundup: Government funding, Taiwan, extenders


Congress is returning to a slew of unfinished priorities and with little time to address them. The immediate focus will be on government funding, but lawmakers are also still considering various tax priorities.




Government funding


The House and Senate have reconvened and with just 18 days before government funding is set to expire. With the 12 appropriations bills nowhere near completion, lawmakers are all but certain to need a continuing resolution (CR) to keep the government funded beyond Sept. 30. House hardline conservatives are already lodging objections and demanding policy concessions in order to support a CR. The Democratic Senate is unlikely to agree to concessions, raising the possibility of shutdown. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., could roll conservatives by securing Democratic support for a short-term CR, but risks losing his leadership in the blowback. The result could be Congress a series of short-term funding extensions consuming much of the fall, a maneuver that dampens prospects for a tax agreement. A single long-term omnibus spending bill would be a better vehicle to carry a tax package.




Aviation taxes


Authorization and funding for the Federal Aviation Administration is also set to expire on Sept. 30 along with the excise taxes that fund the FAA. An extension of both the FAA and the related taxes are likely, which would include the following taxes: 

  • 3-cents-per-gallon excise tax on noncommercial aviation gasoline
  • 8-cents-per-gallon excise tax on noncommercial aviation kerosene
  • 5% tax on the base ticket price
  • $4.80-per-person domestic segment tax for a single takeoff and landing (indexed for inflation)
  • $21.10-per-person international travel facilities tax for flights that begin or end in the U.S. ($10.60 for a flight that begins or ends in Alaska or Hawaii, indexed for inflation)
  • 25% tax on the amount paid for transporting property by air



Business extenders


Discussions over a tax package have been subsumed by the more urgent spending fights. The two sides appear no closer to an agreement to trade child tax credit (CTC) enhancements for restoring research expensing under Section 174, reinstating 100% bonus depreciation, and providing relief for the Section 163(j) limit on interest deductions. Republicans have signaled they are open to child tax credit relief and Democrats have acknowledged this relief must be proportional to the business provisions. But there are still many hurdles that could scuttle a deal, including Republican demands for CTC work requirements and deficit concerns.




Taiwan tax benefits


The prospects are better for legislation to confer treaty-like benefits to Taiwan. The Senate Finance Committee is looking to quickly mark up their draft legislation soon, which has bipartisan support. The effort is complicated by competing legislation form the Foreign Relations Committee that would instead allow the administration to negotiation a tax agreement with Taiwan.




Republican target tax-exempt political activity


House Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith, R-Mo., issued an open letter criticizing the political activity of some tax-exempt organizations and asking for public input. Hearings and draft legislation addressing the issue are possible this fall.




Other priorities


Lawmakers are also considering housing legislation that could include tax credits, technical corrections to recent retirement tax provisions, and legislation raising the threshold at which Form 1099-K reporting is required for third-party payment networks under Section 6050W. The current political climate makes housing legislation very difficult. The need for retirement technical corrections was greatly reduced by recent IRS guidance. It’s also possible the IRS extends Form 1099-K relief and relieves pressure for Congress to act.



Tax professional standards statement

This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “§,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.


More tax hot topics