President Joe Biden recently pushed new tax changes in his State of the Union address, proposing to quadruple the 1% excise tax on corporate stock repurchases and resurrect a “billionaire” minimum tax.
Neither change is likely to advance while Republicans control the House. Biden provided no new information on a the “billionaire tax,” but he was presumably referring to his past budget proposal that targeted the unrealized gains of taxpayers with more than $100 million in assets. The 1% excise tax on public stock buybacks was enacted as part of the Inflation Reduction Act and took effect on Jan. 1, 2023.
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., wasted no time throwing cold water Biden’s proposals, as he reinforced his promise to not raise taxes in a closed-door caucus meeting following the State of the Union.
Key members of the Ways and Means Committee echoed McCarthy’s comments on tax increases but signaled some openness to compromising on the expanded child tax credit. They expressed support for a smaller extenders package if Democrats are willing to negotiate with Republicans on work requirements for the expanded child tax credit and add Republican priorities to a package — like retroactively restoring expensing of research and experimental costs under Section 174, extending 100% bonus depreciation (which reverted to 80% for property placed in service after 2022), and retroactively providing relief from the limit on interest deductions under Section 163(j).
The comments offer some hope for resurrecting a potential deal, but negotiations over an extenders have floundered for months now. A breakthrough on the child tax credit would be needed, and other legislative issues — like the debt limit — have taken priority on Capitol Hill.
Any extenders deal may also need a broader legislative vehicle. There is some speculation that a technical correction needed for the “SECURE 2.0” legislation enacted on Dec. 29, 2022, via the omnibus spending bill (H.R. 2617), could be one option to move a tax title.
The legislation contains a drafting error that may bar individuals from making any catch-up contributions (pre-tax or Roth) beginning in 2024. The error involved the unintentional elimination of a subparagraph in the body of the legislation to allow for a conforming amendment.
While it is not yet certain if a legislative fix will be necessary, there would be major bipartisan support for such a technical corrections bill in the event it is needed. Such a bill likely would be attractive as a larger tax vehicle, potentially providing an avenue for an extenders deal.
There is also bipartisan interest in providing relief from the new Form 1099-K reporting changes. The IRS recently issued guidance postponing the new $600 reporting threshold for third-party payment networks under Section 6050W that had become effective for payments in 2022 under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. The $600 threshold is now scheduled to be in place for 2023, and there may be bipartisan support for raising it (for more information about the 1099-K requirements, see our prior story, “IRS delays $600 threshold for 1099-K reporting.”
Neither the Form 1099-K relief or catch-up contribution fix needs to be addressed immediately. Congress could wait until late this year to address them, which would rob lawmakers of a potential near-term vehicle to move other tax priorities.
Contact:
Dustin Stamper
Tax Legislative Affairs Practice Leader
Managing Director, Tax Services
Grant Thornton Advisors LLC
Dustin Stamper is a managing director in Grant Thornton’s Washington National Tax Office and leads the tax legislative affairs practice for the firm.
Washington DC, Washington DC
Service Experience
- Tax
Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.
The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “§,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
More tax hot topics
No Results Found. Please search again using different keywords and/or filters.
Share with your network
Share