The IRS recently released new FAQs on the employee retention credit (ERC) that clarify the rules in important ways. The new guidance comes as the IRS steps up enforcement efforts and Congress considers options to address improper claims.
The FAQs address several areas of concern that tax preparers and businesses have encountered, including whether business operations are suspended due to a government order. Employers generally may only claim a credit if they experience a significant decline in gross receipts or a full or partial suspension of business operations due to a governmental order. There has been confusion whether government orders that do not directly impact a business’ operations, but rather cause a significant slowdown in customer traffic or a supply chain disruption, constitute a valid governmental order for the purposes of the ERC.
The FAQs clarify that government orders that do not apply directly to a business’ operations and cause a full or partial suspension of operations cannot be used to substantiate a claim for the ERC. The FAQs also clarify that if a business voluntarily closes its doors or reduces its hours of operation, then the business did not experience a full or partial shutdown for the purposes of the ERC.
Other topics covered in the new ERC FAQs include:
- Eligibility
- Qualifying orders
- Decline in gross receipts
- Recovery startup business
- Claiming the ERC
- ERC scams
- Recordkeeping
- Timing
The IRS is also increasing enforcement efforts aimed at improper claims, and Congress is considering action. In a pair of recent speeches, IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel said the IRS is increasing audit and investigatory activities on both promoters and business as it sees “more and more questionable claims coming in following the onslaught of misleading marketing from promoters pushing businesses to apply.” Testifying before Congress, Werfel suggested giving the IRS authority to regulate return preparers or providing an end date for taxpayers seeking retroactive claims.
Congress appears to be considering its options. House Ways and Means Oversight Committee Chair David Schweikert, R-Ariz., said in a recent hearing that he would consider the IRS proposal to provide a cutoff for new claims, and also discussed a potential amnesty program to allow taxpayers to come forward and rescind improper claims.
Contact:
Jeff Martin
Partner, Washington National Tax Office
Washington, D.C.
Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.
The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
More tax hot topics
No Results Found. Please search again using different keywords and/or filters.