The Tax Court recently issued its opinion in Farhy v. Commissioner (160 T.C. No. 6), holding that the IRS lacked authority to assess penalties against an individual under Section 6038(b) for failure to file Form 5471, Information Return of U.S. Persons With Respect to Certain Foreign Corporations, for tax years 2003 through 2010. As a result, the IRS could not proceed with the collection of such penalties via the proposed levy.
The IRS argued it had authority to assess the penalties under Section 6201, which generally authorizes the Treasury Secretary to make assessments of all taxes — “including interest, additional amounts, additions to the tax, and assessable penalties” — imposed by the Code, which the Secretary has delegated to the IRS. When a tax is assessed, the IRS may take certain actions to collect the tax administratively.
The taxpayer argued that Section 6038(b), unlike other penalty sections in the Code, contains no provision authorizing the assessment of the penalty it provides for. Thus, a Section 6038(b) penalty is not an assessable penalty, although it may be collected through a civil action. The IRS responded that the term “assessable penalties” includes any penalties found in the Code that are not subject to the Code’s deficiency procedures.
The Tax Court agreed with the taxpayer’s reading of the Code and found that the IRS assessed penalties under Section 6038(b) without statutory authority to do so. Thus, the IRS could not proceed with the collection of those penalties via the proposed levy.
The Tax Court further noted that Congress explicitly authorized assessments with respect to many penalty provisions — but not for Section 6038(b) penalties.
The court noted it was “loath to disturb this well-established statutory framework by inferring the power to administratively assess and collect the [S]ection 6038(b) penalties when Congress did not see fit to grant that power to the Secretary of the Treasury expressly as it did for other penalties in the Code.”
The IRS will have 90 days after the entry of a decision in the Tax Court to appeal the decision to Federal Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Contact:
Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.
The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “§,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
More tax hot topics
No Results Found. Please search again using different keywords and/or filters.
Share with your network
Share