The IRS released a package of guidance on June 17 that targets basis shifting transactions involving partnerships and related parties that seek to take advantage of the mechanical Subchapter K rules that apply to distributions of partnership property and transfers of partnership interests.
The guidance package includes three parts:
- Notice 2024-54 announces two forthcoming sets of proposed regulations targeting the ability of partnerships and partners to effectively utilize favorable basis adjustments generated through certain basis-shifting transactions.
- New proposed regulations (REG-124593-23) would make certain basis shifting transactions and substantially similar transactions “transactions of interest,” a designation that requires certain disclosures from taxpayers as well as advisors participating in certain defined transactions.
- Revenue Ruling 2024-14 provides three factual situations involving partnership basis shifting transactions in which the IRS would disregard the favorable basis adjustments under the codified economic substance doctrine described in Section 7701(o).
Taken together, the guidance makes clear that IRS will closely scrutinize the potential benefits of any future or past transactions described in the guidance. In addition, the IRS and Treasury intend to issue specific guidance that would curtail the ability to claim benefits from these transactions, as well as drastically increase the level of scrutiny on taxpayers and advisors structuring and executing these transactions. Designating certain transactions as “transactions of interest” allows the IRS and Treasury to gather broad-based information that will be used to further develop examination techniques for the transactions perceived as abusive.
Grant Thornton Insight
While the guidance package may have originated with intricately structured transactions perceived as abusive by the IRS, the breadth of the proposed regulatory action could present a trap for the unwary in addition to creating a significant administrative burden, even for taxpayers not purposefully engaging in these transactions with a tax avoidance purpose.
Categories of basis shifting transactions
The basis-shifting transactions (sometimes referred to as “covered transactions”) targeted in the June 17 guidance generally fall into several categories, including:
- High-basis property to low-basis partner: In this transaction, a partnership with related partners distributes high-basis property to a related partner with a low-tax basis in its partnership interest. This may allow the partnership to allocate a basis adjustment under Section 734(b) to its remaining properties equal to the excess of the partnership’s prior basis in the distributed property over the distributee partner’s basis in the property (which is limited to such partner’s basis in its partnership interest under Section 732). Such distributions could be structured to shift basis off nondepreciable or long-lived distributed properties and onto retained properties with more favorable cost recovery rules, or property anticipated to be sold in the near future.
- Transfers of partnership interests: These transactions involve transfers of partnership interests between related parties in which the transferor’s basis in its partnership interest exceeds its share of the partnership’s bases in its assets in a transaction that is effectively a non-recognition event to the transferor. These covered transactions seek to take advantage of the transferee’s ability to receive a step-up in the basis of the partnership’s assets through a Section 743(b) adjustment, without a corresponding tax cost to the transferor.
- Low-basis property distribution in liquidation: These transactions involve distributions of low basis property to a partner in liquidation of its partnership interest, where the distributee has a relatively high basis in its partnership interest. The distributee then relies on the Section 732 rules applicable to liquidating distributions of property to assert a stepped-up basis in the distributed property equal to its prior basis in its partnership interest. In this case, the distributed property may be subject to a favorable cost recovery method, or the distributee may anticipate selling the distributed property soon after receiving it.
Notice 2024-54
The notice outlines two sets of regulations the IRS intends to propose. The first would seek to neutralize the benefits sought from covered transactions by preventing partnerships and related partners from utilizing the basis adjustments generated through such transactions. For instance, a basis adjustment allocated to partnership property under Section 734(b) as a result of a covered transaction would remain subject to the cost recovery period and remaining recovery period, if any, applicable to the distributed property giving rise to the adjustment. Further, the partnership would not be permitted to take the Section 734(b) adjustment into account in determining gain from the sale of adjusted property until the distributee partner sells the distributed property to an unrelated taxpayer in a fully taxable, arm’s-length transaction. The proposed regulations would employ conceptually similar limitations on basis adjustments generated through other types of covered transactions.
The IRS said that it intends to propose that final regulations would apply to taxable years ending on or after June 17, 2024. The scope of the regulations would apply to cost recovery deductions and gain or loss calculations related to basis adjustments from covered transactions that occurred in a prior year, or even a tax year for which the period of limitations has expired.
Grant Thornton Insight
These regulations would need to be considered in determining whether cost recovery deductions from prior transactions would still be allowable on any remaining affected basis adjustments. Further, the proposed regulations will apply without regard to whether the covered transaction was structured with a purpose of tax avoidance.
These proposed regulations will utilize a concept of “related persons” that expands beyond the generally applicable relationships under Sections 267(b) and 707(b) to apply the covered transaction rules to transactions involving tax indifferent partners. Potential examples of partners who could be treated the same as related parties, regardless of their relationship to the other partners, may include tax-exempt partners, foreign partners, or partners with tax attributes (such as losses from other sources) that could make them indifferent to tax gain resulting from a covered transaction. For example, a distribution of property to a tax-exempt partner that creates an increase to the basis of the remaining partnership property under Section 734(b) would be treated as a covered transaction.
The second set of forthcoming proposed regulations announced by the notice would be issued under Section 1502. This set of proposed regulations would provide single-entity treatment for members of a consolidated group of corporations that are partners in a partnership with an eye toward preventing covered transactions from shifting basis between group members. The notice mentions that the 2023 corporate tax return forms contain new questions for consolidated groups with gross income in excess of $1 billion to allow the IRS to potentially identify whether the consolidated group reports basis adjustments resulting from covered transactions. The proposed effective date for this second set of proposed regulations would be specified when such proposed regulations are actually issued.
Proposed regulations on reportable transactions
The second component of the June 17 guidance package is a set of proposed regulations (REG-124593-23) that would designate various partnership basis-shifting transactions as transactions of interest under Section 6011 and the regulations thereunder. The designated transactions generally correspond to the covered transactions described in Notice 2024-54. If finalized, these proposed regulations would require taxpayers and material advisors participating in partnership basis-shifting transactions (subject to certain dollar-amount thresholds) to file certain disclosures for reportable transactions under the Section 6011 regulations or be subject to penalties.
The proposed regulations would be effective from the date they appear in the Federal Register as final regulations. Nevertheless, it appears that disclosure could still be required where a partnership or related party takes a cost recovery deduction on a basis adjustment or takes the basis adjustment into account determining gain or loss on the disposition of an asset, where the basis adjustment arose from a transaction of interest in a prior tax year. If such a broad disclosure requirement is ultimately finalized, taxpayers may need to spend additional effort to confirm whether existing basis adjustments are within the scope of the regulations.
Grant Thornton Insight
Transactions of interest are one of several types of reportable transactions that must be disclosed on Form 8886. A transaction of interest is a transaction that the IRS believes has the potential for tax avoidance or evasion but lack sufficient information to determine whether the transaction should be identified specifically as a “listed” transaction. While the regulations are still proposed and the transactions are not yet required to be disclosed on Form 8886, it is worth noting that Rev. Rul. 2024-14, discussed more below, indicates that the IRS believes many of these transactions already lack economic substance and taxpayers could be penalized for a lack of disclosure on Form 8275.
Revenue Ruling 2024-14
The final component of the June 17 guidance package is Rev. Rul. 2024-14, which provides some insight into how the IRS may challenge partnership basis-shifting transactions now under the current economic substance doctrine. The ruling describes three situations (corresponding to the three categories of covered transactions described in Notice 2024-54) involving a partnership owned by members of a corporate consolidated group. In each situation, the partners undertake various transactions to create inside-outside basis discrepancies to facilitate the use of partnership basis shifting transactions. The IRS considered whether the beneficial basis adjustments resulting from the basis-shifting transactions are disregarded under the economic substance doctrine, as codified in Section 7701(o).
Under Section 7701(o)(1) both prongs of a two-prong test must be satisfied in order for a transaction to have economic substance. First, the transaction must change in a meaningful way (apart from federal income tax effects) the taxpayer’s economic position. Second, the taxpayer must have a substantial purpose (apart from federal income tax effects) for entering into the transaction.
For each of the situations considered, the IRS determined that neither prong was satisfied. The IRS determined that the transactions did not change the economic position of any members of the consolidated group in a meaningful way (given that the transactions principally moved assets between taxpayers under common control) and the only stated business purpose for the transactions was cost savings from cleaning up intercompany accounts, reducing administrative complexity, and achieving administrative efficiencies. These items were apparently insignificant compared to the tax savings from the transactions. Holding that the transactions described in all three situations lacked economic substance, the IRS held that the favorable basis adjustments arising from these transactions would be disregarded, with accuracy-related penalties (including for a nondisclosed noneconomic substance transaction) imposed on the relevant parties.
Next steps
The IRS, as well as certain members of Congress, have previously expressed a desire to target transactions described as partnership basis-shifting transactions. With the new guidance package, the IRS has taken steps toward a significant modification of longstanding Subchapter K basis adjustment rules for partnership transactions involving related parties. In addition to restricting the use of favorable basis adjustments arising from these transactions under forthcoming proposed regulations described in Notice 2024-54, the IRS appears poised to require significant additional disclosure with respect to these transactions under the reportable transaction rules. Finally, with Rev. Rul. 2024-14, the IRS has indicated that it will not wait for regulations to be finalized under the various Internal Revenue Code provisions governing partnership basis adjustments and their allocation to challenge basis shifting transactions under generally applicable economic substance principles.
Regulations must still be proposed under Notice 2024-54, and the comment period for the reportable transaction proposed regulations is open with a hearing currently scheduled for Sept. 17, 2024. As such, it is possible that the scope of the guidance items could change. In the meantime, given the apparent broad scope and proposed impact on prior-year transactions under the guidance, it appears that many taxpayers, including those that did not intentionally structure into partnership basis shifting transactions, may need to consider how the potential regulatory changes could impact their ability to continue to utilize historic basis adjustments and the potential compliance burden associated with making those determinations.
For more information, contact:
Content disclaimer
This Grant Thornton Advisors LLC content provides information and comments on current issues and developments. It is not a comprehensive analysis of the subject matter covered. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal, tax, or professional advice provided by Grant Thornton Advisors LLC. All relevant facts and circumstances, including the pertinent authoritative literature, need to be considered to arrive at conclusions that comply with matters addressed in this content.
Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms.
For additional information on topics covered in this content, contact a Grant Thornton Advisors LLC professional.
Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton Advisors LLC’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal, tax, or professional advice provided by Grant Thornton Advisors LLC. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact a Grant Thornton Advisors LLC tax professional. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein.
The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal, tax, or professional advice provided by Grant Thornton Advisors LLC. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact a Grant Thornton Advisors LLC tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton Advisors LLC assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms.
Our fresh thinking
No Results Found. Please search again using different keywords and/or filters.
Share with your network
Share