Tax Court issues another anti-microcaptive opinion

 

The Tax Court has ruled in favor of the IRS In Keating v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2024-2) that a microcaptive arrangement was not “insurance in the commonly accepted sense” under Section 831(b). Section 831(b) permits qualifying insurance company taxpayers to elect to exclude premiums received from gross income, meaning a captive insurance arrangement between related parties provides a permanent benefit. However, the IRS has identified such arrangements as potentially abusive, possibly rising to be transactions of interest or a listed transaction.

This case follows several others that involved particularly bad facts for the taxpayer, including the following practices of the taxpayer:

  • Determining premiums and making adjustments after a loss event
  • Inadequate or absent books and records
  • Determining premiums where it appeared the determinant sought to get as close as possible to the Section 831(b) limit (as opposed to premiums based upon risk exposure)
  • Documentation that stated the arrangement allowed for a tax savings account that could enable circular cash flow

Thus, the IRS argued that this was not “insurance in the commonly accepted sense.” While the court ruled in the agency’s favor, it did not address the other common law factors regarding whether an arrangement is insurance or not. Those factors are risk shifting, risk distribution, and having an insurable risk. 

 

 

Contact:

 
 
Tax professional standards statement

This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

 
 

More tax hot topics