The Supreme Court on June 17 dismissed the latest challenge to the Affordable Care Act in California v. Texas
, ruling in a 7-2 decision that the plaintiffs lack standing.
The plaintiffs had argued that the ACA’s individual mandate became unconstitutional after the penalty amount was lowered to $0 via the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act because it could no longer be classified as a tax. They had further argued that the entire law be struck down, including many significant tax provisions such as the 3.8% tax on net investment income.
The decision holds that while the ACA instructs individuals to obtain health insurance, the IRS can no longer impose a penalty on taxpayers who fail to obtain insurance, meaning the plaintiff individuals in the suit did not show that the law causes any injury. The court also rules that the states that joined also failed to show traceable harm.
Taxpayers who filed protective claims for refunds based on the possibility that the case would strike down tax provisions will not have the opportunity to perfect those claims based on this decision. However, because the court did not rule on the underlying constitutionality or severability issues, it’s possible that future challenges could still be made if plaintiffs can establish standing. The two dissenting justices found standing and would have struck down the entire law, while Justice Thomas suggested in a concurring opinion that standing could be established in future challenges with potential inseverability arguments.
Washington National Tax Office
+1 202 861 4144
Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.
The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.