More than two weeks after the House passed its $1.7 trillion reconciliation package, there has been little progress on the bill in the Senate. Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., remains insistent that he will not back a paid family and medical leave provision backed by progressives, while also raising numerous other issues with the bill—including the impact to the deficit, drug pricing proposals, and the electrical vehicle credit. Manchin has also expressed significant concerns with inflation, and he could use the recent bad numbers on inflation to push for shrinking the bill significantly, pause consideration of the bill, or kill the bill altogether.
In addition, several Senate Democrats are also still negotiating relief from the cap on state and local tax deductions. The House-passed bill would raise the cap to $80,000 but extend it beyond its current expiration in 2026 through 2031 (lowering the cap back to $10,000 in 2031). Senate Budget Committee Chair Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Senate Finance Committee member Robert Menendez, D-N.J., have instead proposed repealing the SALT cap for families making under a certain threshold, while making the current $10,000 cap permanent above that threshold. That proposed threshold is still being debated, however, as Sanders prefers a threshold of around $400,000, while Menendez appears to prefer a number closer to $550,000 for individuals or $1 million for married couples.
Timing also remains a key concern for Democrats, as the goal—though not the technical requirement—has been to pass the reconciliation bill before Congress leaves for its holiday recess, currently scheduled to begin on Dec. 17 (though that date may be delayed). Further complicating reconciliation talks are additional governmental concerns—most notably, the debt ceiling, which the Treasury Department estimates will be reached on Dec. 15.
When asked recently about the timing of the reconciliation bill, Manchin responded, “I don’t control the clock. [Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.] has to make a decision about what he wants to do.”
While the bill is unlikely to pass in its current form, it is still by no means dead. Taxpayers should examine the provisions in detail to determine the potential effect.
Washington National Tax Office
+1 202 861 4144
Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.
The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.