Close
Close

Income not needed for Sec. 355 trade or business

RFP
Tax Hot Topics newsletterThe IRS has issued a private letter ruling (PLR 202009002) concluding that the absence of income collection does not prevent a taxpayer from satisfying the active trade or business requirement under Section 355.

In the ruling, a publicly traded corporation, Distributing, was in Business 1, producing items for commercialization, a process that requires four steps. Each step consisted of subparts, with the second step consisting of four subparts (e.g., 2A, 2B, 2C, and 2D) and step 2C consisting of steps 2C1 and 2C2. Historically, Business 1 consisted of only developing items through step 2C1. Later steps were performed by third parties pursuant to license and collaboration agreements. The business consistently generated income related to items from these research-oriented contracts or licensing agreements.

More than five years prior to the proposed transaction in the ruling, Distributing began conducting research, development, testing and regulatory functions for a particular item that was developed in the business. Distributing intended to develop the item through Step 3 in Business 2, and then partner or collaborate with a third party for the remaining steps after Step 3. Distributing allocated managerial and operational employees and devoted employees full-time to Business 2 and incurred significant salary and wage expenses in connection.

Business 2 never generated income, but Distributing believed that it had the ability to do so because it could have entered into a partnership or collaboration agreement with respect to the item. Distributing also believed that it would be easier to obtain income from the item as it progressed further through the steps toward commercialization, and that it decided to forgo immediate collection of income from Business 2 in favor of the prospect of collecting greater income after Step 3 was completed for the item.

In the ruling, Distributing proposed to form a new corporation, Controlled, and contribute the assets of Business 2 in exchange for all of the stock of Controlled and the assumption of Business 2’s liabilities. Distributing then proposed to distribute all of the stock of Controlled pro rata to its shareholders. Such distribution was intended to qualify as a tax-free distribution under Section 355(a).

Section 355(b)(1) provides that Section 355(a) applies to a distribution if, in addition to other requirements, the distributing corporation and the controlled corporation were engaged in the active conduct of a trade or business immediately after the distribution.

Distributing represented that the distribution would qualify under Section 355 except for the particular issue whether the absence of income collection prevented Business 2 from constituting a trade or business.

The IRS ruled that the absence of income collection did not prevent Business 2 from constituting a trade or business within the meaning of Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.355-3(b)(2)(ii) and thus did not prevent Distributing from satisfying the active trade or business requirement in Section 355 if it did so otherwise.

Contact:
Jeff Borghino
Partner
Washington National Tax Office
T +1 202 521 1532

Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.