Close
Close

Tax Court reminder: Keep proof of mailing

RFP
Tax Hot Topics newsletter The Tax Court relied on testimony and other evidence in Seely v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo 2020-6), to allow a taxpayer’s petition to be deemed timely filed.

The taxpayers in Seely, a married couple, received a statutory notice of deficiency (SNOD) from the IRS on March 28, 2017, relating to their 2013-2015 tax years. The SNOD advised the taxpayers that they had 90 days from the date of the notice to file a petition with the Tax Court for a redetermination of their deficiency. The SNOD also stated that the last day to do so was June 26, 2017.

The taxpayers hired an attorney who filed the petition with the Tax Court, but which was received by the Tax Court on July 17, 2017. The envelope was delivered by the U.S. Postal Service but did not have a postmark. The IRS challenged the petition as untimely and filed a motion to dismiss.

Under Section 6213(a), a taxpayer must petition the court within 90 days after the SNOD is mailed, which, for the taxpayers, was a deadline of June 26, 2017. Section 7502(a) provides the so-called “mailbox rule,” that the date of the U.S. postmark stamped on the mail is deemed to be the date of delivery. In effect, the taxpayers in Seely had until June 26, 2017, to deposit their petition in the U.S. mail, but because the petition did not arrive in an envelope with a postmark, it was unclear whether they did.

The Tax Court took into account all the facts, including the Fourth of July holiday and the attorney’s sworn statement, and ruled that it was more likely than not that the petition was mailed timely, on June 22.

In this case, while the Tax Court ultimately ruled for the taxpayers, allowing the case to proceed, the taxpayers could have avoided this factual determination by simply retaining proof of timely mailing. Taxpayers who have time-sensitive submissions to make to the IRS, such as tax return, extension, or response to a notice, should make such submissions through Certified Mail, retaining proof of timely deposit into the mail system.

Contacts:
David Auclair
National Managing Principal
Washington National Tax Office
T +1 202 521 1515

Shamik Trivedi
Senior Manager
Washington National Tax Office
T +1 202 521 1511

Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.