Close
Close

District Court decision highlights mailbox rule

RFP
Tax Hot Topics newsletter The District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin ruled in Harrison v. U.S., 3:19-cv-00194-wmc (W.D. Wisc. 2020) on Jan. 29, 2020, that the taxpayers, a married couple, timely filed their claim for refund because the claim was submitted by certified mail prior to the close of the statute of limitations.

The decision by comes with some unusual procedural background based on relatively simple facts. The taxpayers had approximately $16,000 in income tax withheld for the tax year 2012. They filed an extension but did not timely file their return by Oct. 15, 2013. Rather, they filed their original return by certified mail on Oct. 11, 2016, and claimed a refund of approximately $7,000. Their claim for refund reached the IRS on Oct. 17, 2016.

In this context, for a refund claim to be proper, there must be 1) full payment of tax; 2) a timely filed claim for refund; and 3) the payment of tax must be within the relevant “look-back” period under Section 6511(b)(2)(A). The district court originally ruled on Jan. 9, 2020, prior to a motion for reconsideration, that under Section 6511(b)(2)(A), the look-back period began on the date the claim for refund was received by the IRS and not the date the claim was filed. The so-called “mailbox rule” of Section 7502 holds that if the claim is timely mailed, it is timely filed.

In coming to its decision, the court relied primarily on Pitre v. IRS, 938 F. Supp. 95 (D.N.H. 1996). However, neither the taxpayer nor the government, or the court itself, considered the Second Circuit’s opinion in Weisbart v. U.S., 222 F.3d 93 (2d. Cir. 2000), which held that the mailbox rule of Section 7502 applied in situations where the claim for refund was the original, late-filed return for purposes of Section 6511(b)(2)(A) and the look-back rule. Nor did any of the parties consider Notice 2001-019 or Treas. Reg. Sec. 301.7502-1(f), each of which adopted the decision by the Second Circuit in Weisbart.

The court reversed itself following the motion for reconsideration, recognizing that Weisbart, Notice 2001-019 and regulations all pointed to the mailbox rule applying for purposes of determining the look-back period of Section 6511(b)(2)(A). Because the taxes that were withheld were deemed paid on April 15, 2013, under Section 6513, the look-back period of three years plus the extension period included the taxpayer’s payment of their tax and importantly, their filing of the claim for refund on Oct. 11, 2016. Accordingly, the look-back period did not limit the amount of the refund the taxpayers claimed.

Contacts:
David Auclair
National Managing Principal
Washington National Tax Office
T +1 202 521 1515

Shamik Trivedi
Senior Manager
Washington National Tax Office
T +1 202 521 1511

Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.