Close
Close

Direct cost of gaining lease must be capitalized

RFP
Tax Hot Topics newsletter The IRS concluded in a Chief Council Advice memorandum (ILM 202005019) that a financial entity must capitalize certain excess markup and participation payments made to acquire automobile and equipment leases. The memorandum stated that the payments are direct costs of acquiring a lease under Treas. Reg. Sec.1.263(a)-4(c)(1)(vi), which are required to be capitalized to the basis of the intangible acquired.

Per the memorandum’s statement of facts, the taxpayer, through its subsidiaries, enters into master agreements with various automobile dealerships and equipment manufacturers and vendors to acquire certain automobile and equipment leases if they meet certain standards set by the taxpayer. The master agreements state that the transaction, if undertaken, is the purchase of the lease contract, and the dealers may not hold themselves out as agents of the taxpayer. The taxpayer and other financial entities that wish to purchase leases bid on individual leases executed between the dealers and their customers. Per the master agreements between the taxpayer and the automobile dealerships, if a dealer accepts the taxpayer’s bid, it shall constitute a sale and assignment of the dealer’s entire right, title and interest in the lease contract, in the vehicle, and in any guaranty or other document executed in connection with the lease contract. The statement of facts assumes that the master agreements, including the sale and assignment of the entire right, title, and interest, are similar for the equipment leases.

The taxpayer’s payment to the automobile dealership consists of a flat-rate fee, and if applicable a premium fee for leases with excess lease rates (“excess markup payment”). For equipment leases, the payment is a set percentage applied to the cost of equipment (“participation payment”). For book purposes, the taxpayer capitalizes and amortizes the excess markup and participation payments over the life of the lease. For tax purposes, the taxpayer deducts excess markup payments, capitalizes certain participation payments in excess of a certain threshold amount, and deducts the remainder of the participation payments.

Section 263(a) and its interpretation by the U.S. Supreme Court in INDOPCO, Inc. v. Commissioner, 503 U.S. 79 (1992) both conclude that amounts related to the acquisition, creation or enhancement of separate and distinct assets also include ancillary transaction costs incurred in the process of acquisition of the assets. In response to the holdings of INDOPCO, the IRS issued Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.263(a)-4(c), clarifying that taxpayers must capitalize amounts paid to another party to acquire any intangible from that party. A lease is specifically listed under Treas. Reg. Sec.1.263(a)-4(c)(1)(vi) as an intangible subject to this rule.

The taxpayer argued that the dealers are acting as intermediaries that assign leases to the taxpayer, and therefore it is not acquiring an intangible asset for tax purposes. However, the IRS disagreed with the taxpayer’s argument, citing the master agreements that clearly state that there is not an agency relationship between the taxpayer and the dealers. Interestingly, neither the taxpayer nor the IRS addressed Section 167(c)(2), which provides that if property is acquired subject to a lease, no amount paid for the property is assigned to the lease; thus the entire amount is allocated to the depreciable asset.

In the taxpayer’s facts, it appears that the taxpayer acquires the dealer’s entire right, title, and interest in the lease contract, in the vehicle, and in any guaranty or other document executed in connection with the lease contract. The taxpayer therefore appears to have acquired property subject to a lease, to which the rules under Section 167(c)(2) may apply. However, this issue is not addressed, and the IRS concluded that the taxpayer acquired leases, which constitutes the acquisition intangible assets within the meaning of Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.263(a)-4(c), and therefore the excess markup and participation payments are required to be capitalized to the basis of the lease.

Contacts:
Sharon Kay
Partner
Washington National Tax Office
T +1 202 861 4140

John Suttora
Managing Director
Washington National Tax Office
T +1 202 521 1523

Caleb Cordonnier
Manager
Washington National Tax Office
T +1 202 521 1555

Dennis St. Martin
Manager
Washington National Tax Office
T +1 202 521 1562

Jason Seo
Senior Associate
Washington National Tax Office
T +1 202 521 1556

Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.