Close
Close

IRS issues ruling on long-term contracts

RFP
Tax Hot Topics newsletter The IRS ruled in PLR 202046001 that a taxpayer’s production and installation contract is subject to the percentage-of-completion method (PCM) under Section 460(f)(2), and that the taxpayer’s prepayments to its subsidiary are contract costs incurred in the contracting year for purposes of computing the completion factor under the PCM.

The taxpayer in the ruling is a business that entered into a contract to design, manufacture, construct and install certain products. Under the contract, it was responsible for procuring or manufacturing the necessary raw materials, parts and components. It reasonably expected the average production period would exceed 12 months and made prepayments in the contracting year to its subsidiary for those items.

Generally, Section 460(a) requires a taxpayer to use the PCM for its long-term contracts, which under Section 460(f)(2) includes a long-term contract that involves the manufacture of any unique item of a type which is not normally included in finished goods inventory or any item that normally requires more than 12 months to complete.

The IRS ruled that the contract is a long-term manufacturing contract subject to the PCM because the taxpayer’s average production period for all the products manufactured under the contract takes more than 12 months to complete. In addition, the taxpayer’s prepayments to its subsidiary in the contracting year are subject to the PCM because such costs are direct material costs, since they are incurred to procure parts and raw materials related to the long-term contract. The IRS held that the taxpayer must treat the prepayments to its subsidiary as incurred in the contracting year because under Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.461-4(d)(2)(ii), the contract costs are incurred either when the subsidiary provides the raw materials, parts and components to the taxpayer or when the taxpayer makes payments to the subsidiary for the raw materials, parts and components, whichever is earlier.

Contacts:
Sharon Kay
Partner
Washington National Tax Office
T +1 202 861 4140

Caleb Cordonnier
Manager
Washington National Tax Office
T +1 202 521 1555

Jason Seo
Senior Associate
Washington National Tax Office
T +1 202 521 1556

Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.