Close
Close

Tax treaties finally score chance to move

RFP
Tax Hot Topics newsletter The three tax treaties and four tax treaty protocols that have languished without ratification for nearly a decade have a chance to advance in the Senate this summer.

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee scheduled a meeting for June 25 to prepare the four protocols for Senate floor action. The three tax treaties are also expected to get committee considerations soon if the issues related to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act can be resolved.

All seven treaty instruments have been held up for years by objections from Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) over information-sharing provisions. Senate leaders had been unwilling to dedicate the considerable Senate floor time needed to overcome the objections, but Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has quietly signaled recently that he hopes to move at least some of the instruments in the coming months.

Supporters of the treaty instruments appear optimistic, but hurdles remain. Treasury has concluded that the three new treaties for Chile, Hungary and Poland require reservations to account for the enactment of the base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT). Treasury maintains that the four treaty protocols with Spain, Switzerland, Japan and Luxembourg do not. Senate Foreign Relations Committee ranking minority member Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) has sparred with Treasury over a lack of transparency on their conclusions. He has indicated he is ultimately inclined to support the instruments, but the issue could delay or even derail the process.

It is also unclear how much floor time McConnell is ultimately willing to dedicate to the treaty instruments, or whether unforeseen developments will emerge to take precedence. McConnell is particularly eager to move the Spanish protocol over constituent concerns, while Democrats have made the Swiss protocol their top priority. Those two instruments are expected to move first, and if Paul continues to drag out the process and floor time is a problem, it’s possible the less urgent treaty instruments are abandoned. The three tax treaties requiring reservations could also potentially face additional challenges based on the reservation issue.

Contacts:
Dustin Stamper
Managing Director
Washington National Tax Office 
T +1 202 861 4144

Omair Taher
Senior Associate
Washington National Tax Office 
T +1 202 861 4143

Tax professional standards statement 
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.