Republicans and Democrats are finding common ground on two technical fixes to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) involving the effective date for new net operating loss (NOL) rules and the eligibility of qualified improvement property (QIP) for bonus deprecation, according to a staffer at the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT).
Democrats have so far been stingy in allowing changes to the TCJA. They agreed to fix a TCJA provision that provided a bias toward grain cooperatives, but have otherwise opposed most changes based on their general opposition to the underlying bill. A hearing last week at the Ways and Means Committee reiterated how divided the two parties remain over the legislation.
House Republican Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., confirmed that the full House will vote on a “Tax Reform 2.0” bill that is currently being written by Ways and Means Chair Kevin Brady, R-Texas, and is expected to propose making the temporary aspects of TCJA permanent. Democrats have criticized TCJA by claiming it is ballooning the deficit and benefiting the wealthy, and are campaigning this year on promises to roll back parts of it.
With only 51 seats in the Senate, Republicans have no real chance at enacting a second round of major tax reform this year, and need at least nine Senate Democrats even to pass technical corrections. Democrats are not expected to agree on a comprehensive technical corrections bill addressing all the glitches, but could agree to limited changes if they receive concessions.
The JCT staffer indicated Democrats are close to agreeing to fix the issues with QIP and NOLs. The legislative history of TCJA indicates that lawmakers clearly intended to consolidate the special provisions for qualified retail, restaurant and leasehold improvement property into a single definition of QIP that would be eligible for 100% bonus depreciation. But the statutory language omits the definition of QIP in the intended location, causing considerable confusion. In addition, the legislative history indicates that lawmakers clearly intended to make a change to the NOL carry-back rules effective for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2017, but the actual language makes the change effective for years ending after Dec. 31, 2017.
Contact Dustin Stamper
Director, Washington National Tax Office
+1 202 861 4144
Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.
The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.