The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on Aug. 7 abruptly withdrew its decision in Altera Corp. v. Commissioner
, Nos. 16-70496, 16-70497 (9th Cir. 2018).
The one sentence order
came on the heels of the court’s split decision upholding cost-sharing regulations under Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.482-7(d)(2) that required the inclusion of stock-based compensation in cost-sharing cost pools. That July 24 decision reversed the Tax Court’s unanimous opinion in Altera Corp. v. Commissioner
, 145 T.C. 91 (2015), which invalidated the regulations under the Administrative Procedure Act.
One of the judges in the majority, Judge Stephen Reinhardt, died in March 2018, five months after the oral arguments were held in October 2017. On Aug. 2, the 9th Circuit replaced Judge Reinhardt with Judge Susan P. Graber.
The order to withdraw the decision could have a significant impact on the eventual outcome of the case. Judge Graber will review the Tax Court record de novo
and may come to a different conclusion than the majority of the original three-judge panel. Her vote will be critical to determining whether the cost-sharing regulations at issue are invalidated or not.
It is unclear how long Judge Graber’s review will take, and it is possible that the reconstituted judicial panel will issue its decision after the extended corporate tax return due date of Oct. 15. Thus, for now, the Tax Court’s original decision invalidating the regulations stands, and taxpayers who were in the process of responding to the 9th Circuit’s reversal might want to consider changing course.
For more information contact: David Sites
National Managing Partner, International Tax Services
Washington National Tax Office
+1 202 861 4104
Managing Director, National IRS Practice and Procedure Leader
+1 202 521 1513
Managing Director, Transfer Pricing, International Tax Services
+1 415 365 5442
Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.
The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.