Close
Close

Partisan fight dims prospects for tax reform fixes

RFP
Tax Hot Topics newsletterThe Senate Finance Committee held a contentious hearing in late April over the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TJCA) to taxpayers and the economy. The partisan disagreement reinforced how difficult it will be for lawmakers to agree on either technical corrections or extensions of the expiring portions.

Democrats and their witnesses claimed that companies were using the tax cuts primarily to pay for stock buybacks, and that wealthy taxpayers were benefiting the most from the bill. Republicans countered by pointing to strong economic growth numbers and news of employee bonuses and increased hiring.

Polls have shown Americans split over TCJA, and both parties appear willing to use the issue as part of their platform for the November elections. House Ways and Means Chair Kevin Brady, R-Texas, is pushing to have a vote on tax reform follow-up bill before the election. He said the bill would make the individual changes permanent and could include improvements to education and retirement incentives.

Democratic opposition to the TCJA makes any further legislation extremely unlikely. Republicans cannot use reconciliation to make the individual tax changes permanent, meaning they would need at least nine Democratic votes to pass any such legislation in the Senate. This appears all but impossible, and any House vote on a second tax reform bill would likely be largely symbolic.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said the administration prefers to wait until after the November elections before pushing legislation to make the individual changes to TCJA permanent. But even if Republicans hold onto the House majority, it appears unlikely they can gain the nine seats in the Senate needed to make permanent tax cuts outside reconciliation.

Democrats have shown slightly more flexibility on technical corrections. They agreed to fix a TCJA provision that provided a bias toward grain cooperatives, but have otherwise opposed most changes. Their firm opposition to the underlying bill in the latest hearing confirms that they are unlikely to help Republicans fix issues without significant concessions. Taxpayers should not expect Congress to pass a full package of technical corrections any time in the near term.

Contact
Dustin Stamper
Director, Washington National Tax Office
T +1 202 861 4144

Shamik Trivedi
Senior Manager, Washington National Tax Office
T +1 202 521 1511

Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.