Close
Close

IRS rules that subsidiary’s profit is excluded under intercompany transaction rules

RFP
Tax Hot Topics newsletterThe IRS ruled in a private letter ruling (PLR 201828006) that the net profit of a corporation in a consolidated group was excluded under Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.1502-13.

In the ruling, a corporation (Parent), was a publicly traded holding company and the common parent of a consolidated group. Parent owned all of the stock of a corporation (Sub). Parent made public offerings of preferred stock and such offerings were underwritten by Sub through a directly owned entity of Sub that was disregarded for U.S. federal tax purposes. Parent paid Sub underwriting fees with respect to the offerings and Sub incurred expenses with respect to underwriting the offerings. Parent represented that it has not and will not claim a deduction with respect to the underwriting fees paid to Sub.

Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.1502-13 governs intercompany transactions between members of a consolidated group. The regulations refer to “S” as the member providing services, and “B” as the member receiving services. S’s income, gain, deduction, and loss from an intercompany transaction are its intercompany items, and B’s income, gain, deduction, and loss from an intercompany transaction are its corresponding items.

Under Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.1502-13(c)(1), the separate attributes of S’s intercompany items and B’s corresponding items are re-determined to the extent necessary to produce the same effect on consolidated taxable income (and consolidated tax liability) as if S and B were divisions of a single corporation, and the intercompany transaction was a transaction between divisions. The regulations, and Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.1502-13(c)(6), further provide that S’s intercompany items might be re-determined to be excluded from gross income under certain specific circumstances, and also provide that the Commissioner may determine that S’s intercompany items may be excluded if they are consistent with the purposes of the regulations.  

The IRS ruled in the PLR that Sub’s net profit (the underwriting fees received from Parent less Sub’s expenses with respect to underwriting the offerings) was determined to be excluded from Sub’s gross income under Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.1502-13(c)(6)(ii). Presumably, because Parent was not claiming a deduction for the underwriting fees, Sub’s intercompany items were determined to be excluded in order to produce the same effect as if Parent and Sub were divisions of a single corporation.

Contact Joshua Brady
Principal
National Tax Standards Group
T +1 202 521 1563

Jeff Borghino
Director
Washington National Tax Office
T +1 202 521 1532

Tax professional standards statement 
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.