Court rules that underwriters’ commissions paid upon the sale of stock in an IPO cannot be treated as a reduction of ordinary income

In Hann v. U.S., 120 AFTR 2d 2017-5518 (2017), the taxpayer, an individual, exercised stock options in his employer’s stock that were immediately sold after the exercise as part of an initial public offering of the employer’s stock. The underwriters charged a commission that was deducted from the taxpayer’s cash proceeds upon sale of the stock. This case in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims addressed the tax treatment of the commission.

The taxpayer’s employer issued a Form W-2 that included compensation income related to the stock option exercise. The amount included on the Form W-2 was equal to the fair market value of the stock at the time of exercise, minus the exercise price. The stock was sold immediately upon exercise, so the fair market value of the stock at the time of exercise was equal to the gross sales proceeds the taxpayer received when his stock was sold in the initial public offering.

On his original federal income tax return, the taxpayer treated the commission as a capital loss. The taxpayer later amended his return to reflect the commission as a reduction of his gross income. This resulted in a refund claim due to the difference between ordinary and capital gain rates, and due to the $3,000 annual limit on the amount by which short-term capital losses can offset ordinary income. The IRS refused to issue the refund, so the taxpayer sued.

The taxpayer put forth several arguments for treating the commission as a reduction of gross income. For example, he argued that the commission was an ordinary and necessary expense incurred in a trade or business. He also argued that because the commission was paid to generate ordinary income (referring to the income generated upon exercising the options), it should be deductible from ordinary income.

The court rejected all of the taxpayer’s arguments and held that commissions are properly treated as a reduction in the amount realized on the sale of stock. The taxpayer had basis in the stock equal to his exercise price plus the amount reported as income on his Form W-2. The amount reported as income on his Form W-2 was based on gross sales proceeds, but his actual proceeds reflected a reduction for the commission. Thus, he had a capital loss equal to the amount of the commission.

The stock was sold immediately upon acquisition, so the loss associated with the commission was a short-term capital loss. The court held that the taxpayer properly treated the commission as a short-term capital loss on his original return, and denied the refund reflected on his amended return.


Eddie Adkins
Partner, Washington National Tax Office
T +1 202 521 1565

Jeffrey Martin
Partner, Washington National Tax Office
T +1 202 521 1526

Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.