Close
Close

IRS publishes revenue ruling on ‘North-South’ spinoffs

RFP
Tax Hot Topics:IRS publishes revenue ruling on ‘North-South’ spinoffsIn Situation 1 of the Rev. Rul., Parent owns all the stock of Distributing, which owns all the stock of Controlled. On Date 1, Parent purports to contribute $25x of property of Controlled in a Section 351 exchange. On Date 2, Distributing spins off the stock of Controlled worth $100x to the Parent.

The IRS provided a taxpayer-favorable ruling to not integrate the transactions and respect the Section 351 transfer and Section 355 spinoff as separate transactions. If the transactions had been integrated, there would be a Section 1001 exchange of $25x of property for $25x of stock and then a taxable distribution of the remaining $75x of stock (as Distributing is no longer distributing Section 368(c) control).

In Situation 2 of Rev. Rul. 2017-9, on Date 1 Controlled distributes a total of $25 x of property up to Distributing in what would independently appear to be a Section 301 distribution, but which is expressly stated to have been done in “pursuance of the plan of reorganization.” On Date 2, Distributing contributes an asset worth $100x to Controlled and spins off Controlled in what would appear to be a reorganization under Section 368(a)(1)(D) with a Section 355 spinoff.

With respect to Situation 2, the IRS ruled that Section 361(b) is “the exclusive measure of dividend income provided by Congress where cash is distributed to shareholders as an incident of a reorganization (citing Estates of Bell v. Commissioner, T.C.M 1971-285). The distribution by Controlled to Distributing in Situation 2 was made in pursuance of a reorganization. Therefore, the distribution should be treated as “boot” subject to recognition of gain.

Contact:
Andy Cordonnier

Partner, Washington National Tax Office
T +1 202.521.1502

Jeff Borghino
Partner, Washington National Tax Office
T +1 202.521.1532

Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.