Close
Close

IRS does not acquiesce to Stine and Shea Homes

RFP
Tax Hot Topics: IRS does not acquiesce to Stine and Shea HomesThe IRS issued two actions on decisions (AODs) related to Stine, LLC v. U.S., No. 13-03224, 2015 WL 403146 (W.D. La. Jan. 27, 2015) and Shea Homes, Inc., 834 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2016), aft’g 142 T.C. 60 (2014).

In AOD 2017-2 the IRS announced that it does not acquiesce to the holding in Stine. In Stine, the IRS asserted that two retail buildings were not placed into service for purposes of qualifying for Gulf Opportunity Zone (so-called GO Zone) tax incentives because the buildings were not open for business to customers. The two buildings had received certifications of completion and occupancy, which established that the buildings were substantially completed and that limited occupancy was granted. The court held that a building is placed in service when it is substantially complete, meaning in a condition of readiness and availability to perform the function for which it was built — in this instance to house and secure racks, shelving and merchandise.

In AOD 2017-3 the IRS announced that it does not acquiesce to the holding in Shea Homes. In Shea Homes, the IRS took the position that the subject matter of the contract was each individual home in the development and that each such contract was completed upon the sale of the home. The taxpayers took the position that the subject matter of the contracts was broader and encompassed the entire development, and the completion and sale of the home was only a part of the development phase. Under such an interpretation, the costs of the contract included all common improvements associated with the development. After applying the applicable provisions of state law, the Tax Court found that the method of accounting used by the taxpayers clearly reflects income and that that IRS was not permitted to change their method of accounting, even to a method that more clearly reflects income.

Notably, the IRS Large Business and International division (LB&I) announced in January that it would be pursuing an audit campaign against large land developers that construct in residential communities that may be improperly using the completed contract method. While the IRS and Treasury are working on regulations in the area, LB&I announced that it would address this issue through the development of a practice unit, issuance of soft-letters, and a follow-up with issue-based examinations when warranted.

Contacts
Sharon Kay

Partner, Washington National Tax Office
+1 202 861 4140

Ellen Martin
Partner, Washington National Tax Office
+1 202 521 1558

Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.