Close
Close

Proposed regulations would require more transparency for certain wholly owned domestic disregarded entities

RFP
Tax Hot Topics - Proposed regulations would require more transparency for certain wholly owned domestic disregarded entitiesThe Treasury Department and the IRS released proposed regulations (REG-127199-15) that would treat a domestic disregarded entity wholly owned by a foreign person as a domestic corporation separate from its owner for limited information-reporting purposes. Specifically, such treatment would apply to reporting, record maintenance and associated compliance requirements that otherwise apply to 25% foreign-owned domestic corporations under Section 6038A. The proposed regulations would expand the IRS’s ability to collect information from foreign-owned disregarded entities, many of which are currently not obligated to file a return or obtain an employer identification number (EIN) under current law.

The proposed regulations would require certain domestic disregarded entities to file Form 5472, Information Return of a 25% Foreign-Owned U.S. Corporation or a Foreign Corporation Engaged in a U.S. Trade or Business, to report transactions that would have been regarded under general U.S. tax principles if the entity had been, in fact, a corporation for U.S. tax purposes. The proposed regulations would also require certain domestic disregarded entities to maintain records sufficient to establish the accuracy of the information return and determine the correct U.S. tax treatment of reported transactions. Because these domestic disregarded entities would have a filing obligation, they would also be required to obtain an EIN by filing a Form SS-4, Application for Employer Identification Number, which would include responsible party information.   

The preamble to the proposed regulations noted that these changes are intended to improve the IRS’s access to information it needs to satisfy its obligations under U.S. tax treaties, tax information exchange agreements and similar international agreements, as well as to strengthen the enforcement of U.S. tax laws. The regulations follow certain news reports detailing the use of limited liability companies by foreign investors and mounting pressure from other countries to help combat potential tax evasion.

The proposed regulations specifically state that the exceptions for small corporations and for de minimis transactions, which normally apply to 25% foreign-owned corporations, will not apply to domestic disregarded entities required to comply under the proposed amendments. Carving out these exceptions significantly expands the scope of domestic disregarded entities that may need to comply with the proposed regulations when made final.

Finally, the proposed regulations expand reportable transactions to include amounts paid or received in connection with the formation, dissolution, acquisition or disposition of the entity, including contributions to and distributions from domestic disregarded entities by including all transactions as defined under Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.482-1(i)(7). Effectively, the proposed regulations would require certain domestic disregarded entities to compute and report all related-party transactions under the transfer pricing provisions of the regulations under Section 482.

The proposed regulations, if made final, will apply to taxable years ending on or after the date that is 12 months after the date the rules are published as final in the Federal Register.

Many domestic disregarded entities affected by these rules aren’t obligated to file returns under current law and may not otherwise maintain books and records in accordance with U.S. GAAP or compute adjustments as would be required under Section 482 or other general U.S. tax principles. Conversely, the proposed regulations would significantly increase the compliance burden of many foreign persons operating in the U.S. through such domestic disregarded entities and would penalize those that abstained.   

The proposed regulations remain largely silent on how the IRS intends to administer these rules (for example, whether a Form 1120, U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return, would be required as part of the procedure to submit the information returns).

Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.