Close
Close

IRS appeals Altera to Ninth Circuit

RFP
Tax Hot Topics: IRS appeals AlteraThe government appealed Altera Corp. v. Commissioner, 145 T.C. No. 3 (2015), to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on Feb. 19. The IRS lost the Altera case on July 27, 2015, in the Tax Court, which held that a 2003 Treasury regulation mandating that controlled entities entering into qualified cost- sharing arrangements (QCSAs) must share stock-based compensation (SBC) costs, was invalid.

The Tax Court’s decision was unanimous and concluded that the regulation was invalid because the IRS and Treasury failed to satisfy the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act. Both the Ninth Circuit and the Tax Court had previously invalidated the 1995 version of the same regulation in Xilinx Inc. v. Commissioner, 125 T.C. 37 (2005), aff’d, 598 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 2010). The Ninth Circuit held in Xilinx that SBC costs were not required to be shared under the prior cost-sharing regulation.

The Tax Court’s decision raised many questions regarding how taxpayers with QCSAs should treat SBC costs. The IRS’s appeal adds uncertainty to the future of the regulation and how taxpayers with QCSAs should proceed as the case moves through the Ninth Circuit.

Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.