Administration pans ‘IP box' proposals

Tax Hot Topics: Administration pans IP box proposalsThe Obama administration launched a pre-emptive attack last week on a potential international tax reform plan from House Republicans that would include a reduced rate for income derived from U.S. intellectual property (IP).

Jason Furman, the chair of the White House’s Council of Economic Advisers, dedicated nearly an entire speech on March 11 to arguing that an “IP box” with reduced rates for domestic IP is difficult to administer and less efficient than the research credit. Mark Mazur, Treasury Assistant Secretary of Tax Policy, followed up with a blog post the very same day calling an IP box a “bad innovation,” saying it would generate legal disputes, apply benefits inequitably and do little to encourage domestic investment in research.

The administration’s arguments appear to be aimed directly at the Republicans on the House Ways and Means Committee, who are working on an international tax reform draft. The effort is partially spearheaded by Ways and Means Committee Member Charles W. Boustany Jr., R-La., who last year released an “IP box” discussion draft that would have provided a deduction for C corporations on income derived from using domestic IP.

Committee Chair Kevin Brady, R-Texas, recently said the committee had not made any decision on how to integrate an IP box as part of broader international reform and that he had no formal timetable for when a new bill would be unveiled.

Tax professional standards statement This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.