Close
Close

Partnership denied refund of underpayment interest because of statute of limitations

RFP
Tax Hot Topics: Refund of underpayment interestThe Court of Federal Claims on Oct. 15 dismissed a taxpayer’s refund suit, for erroneously calculated large corporate underpayment (LCU) interest resulting from certain partnership adjustments, because the taxpayer’s claim was not made within the special limitations period of Section 6230.

The issue before the court in General Mills v. U.S., No. 14-89T (Fed. Cl. 2015), was whether a partnership controlled by the taxpayer was timely in seeking a refund of LCU interest assessed by the IRS during examinations of multiple tax years of the partnership. During the examination, which covered the partnership’s 2002 through 2006 tax years, the IRS assessed LCU interest, which, under Section 6621(c), says that deficiencies of $100,000 or more are charged an interest rate of 2% higher than the standard rate of interest.

The partnership ultimately settled the examination with the IRS in April 2011, paying additional taxes and interest attributable to the IRS’s adjustments. Thereafter, the IRS assessed the partnership with additional interest, including the LCU interest. In March 2013, the partnership filed a refund claim with the IRS for the LCU interest paid, alleging that the IRS used the wrong applicable date to assess the accrual of interest.

Under Section 6511(a), a taxpayer claiming a refund or credit must file a claim within two years of payment of the tax or three years from the filing of the original return, whichever is later. The taxpayer and the government agreed that the taxpayer’s claim for refund was filed within this two- year period, but the IRS argued that Section 6230(c), which provides for a six-month limitations period, governed the refund claim in this case.

Section 6230(c) says that a partner may file a claim for refund “on the grounds that . . . [the IRS] erroneously computed any computational adjustment necessary . . . to apply to the partner a settlement.” Such a claim must be filed within six months after the day on which the IRS mailed the notice of computational adjustment to the partner, under Section 6230(c)(2)(A).

The court determined that LCU interest is a computational adjustment that is directly assessed by the IRS. Treas. Reg. Sec. 301.6231(a)(6)-1(b) states that a computational adjustment includes “any interest due with respect to any underpayment.” In addition, Section 6511(g) states that with respect to taxes attributed to any partnership item, Sections 6227 and 6230(c) and (d) apply in lieu of Section 6511.

Contacts
David Auclair
+1 202 521 1515
david.auclair@us.gt.com

Shamik Trivedi
+1 202 521 1511
shamik.trivedi@us.gt.com

Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.