Close
Close

Policyholder dividends deductible under recurring item exception

RFP
Tax Hot TopicsTax Hot Topics
In Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. U.S, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 57 (Fed. Cir. 2015), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Court affirmed the deductibility of policyholder dividends under the recurring item exception. The court reasoned that the policyholder dividends were fixed in the year the dividends were announced, the dividends were premium adjustments and the premium adjustments were rebates.  

The taxpayer, a mutual life insurance company, offered a participating policy to its policyholders. This type of policy provided for eligible policyholders — those with policies paid through the anniversary date of the policy — to receive a portion of any distribution of the company’s yearly surplus. The taxpayer implemented a policy of guaranteeing a minimum amount of dividends (guaranteed dividends) for a defined class of eligible policyholders. Each year, the taxpayer’s board of directors determined the guaranteed dividend and passed a resolution memorializing the amount. The payment was guaranteed to an entire class of policyholders on a pro rata basis, and if an individual member of the class terminated his or her policy, the guaranteed dividend was distributed in full to the remaining members.

Based on its policy, the taxpayer deducted a portion of the guaranteed divided that would be paid by Sept. 15 of the next year under the recurring item exception. The Court of Federal Claims determined that the taxpayer’s deductions met the recurring item exception because they were fixed in the year the dividends were determined and the guaranteed dividends were rebates.

On appeal, the government challenged the timing of the deductions, claiming that the guaranteed dividends weren’t true obligations, the guaranteed dividends weren’t fixed in the year the dividends were set by the board and the payments weren’t rebates.

In determining that the guaranteed dividends were actual obligations, the appeals court noted that the taxpayer’s policy stated that the taxpayer would pay dividends to eligible policyholders and that state regulators were authorized to enforce the taxpayer’s guarantees. The court also concluded that the payments were fixed in the year in which the board of directors adopted the guaranteed dividend resolutions because there was a group of policyholders with paid-up premiums who would ultimately receive the payments. Further, the court reasoned that the plain and ordinary meaning of the terms “rebate” and “refund” included premium adjustments distributed to the policyholder in the form of dividends. Accordingly, the Federal Circuit affirmed the Court of Federal Claims’ finding that the taxpayer may deduct amounts for its guaranteed dividends under the recurring item exception.

Contacts
Sharon Kay
+1 202 861 4140
sharon.kay@us.gt.com

Ellen Martin
+1 202 521 1588
ellen.martin@us.gt.com

Tax professional standards statement
This document supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the subject of this document, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss the potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this document may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this document is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.