Close
Close

IRS memorandum rejects stacking of statutes of limitation for refund or credit

RFP
Tax Hot Topics IRS rejects stacking of  statute of limitationsIn a chief counsel advice (CCA) memorandum released April 24 (CCA 201517005), the IRS Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration) said a taxpayer could not use two separate statutes of limitation, either together or separately, to obtain a refund in a closed tax year, because the statutes of limitation were mutually exclusive related to a given overpayment.

Under the facts of the memorandum, the taxpayer claimed a foreign tax credit under Section 901 in Year 4. In Year 13, the taxpayer filed an amended return for Year 4, seeking to change its election from a credit to a deduction for foreign taxes paid under Section 164. The deduction would serve to reduce the taxpayer’s income in Year 4, resulting in a net operating loss (NOL). On the same day, the taxpayer filed an amended return for Year 2, carrying back the NOL.

The IRS said the claim for refund in Year 2, when made in Year 13, was not timely under both Sections 6511(d)(2) and 6511(d)(3). Under Section 6511(d)(2), the general three-year statute of limitations for credit or refund is extended for refunds “attributable to” an NOL. In such a case, the claim for refund is timely if it is filed within three years of the due date (including extensions) for the return for the loss year. In this case, the loss year was Year 4, and Section 6511(d)(2), the claim for refund, should have been filed by Year 7.

Section 6511(d)(3) provides for a 10-year statute of limitations for a claim of credit or refund related to an overpayment that can be attributed to any foreign taxes paid for which a credit under Section 901 is “allowed.” The IRS explains that in this circumstance, there is an important distinction between whether a credit is allowed or allowable. Section 275(a)(4), as well as the regulations under Sections 164 and 901, state that a credit is allowable unless a deduction is taken, and a deduction is allowable unless a credit is taken. Under Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.901-1(h), a credit is allowed only when chosen, and is not allowed when a deduction is taken in lieu of that credit.

As a result, the extended statute of limitations under Section 6511(d)(3) applies only to overpayments that can be attributed to foreign taxes for which a credit is allowed, and not for overpayments that can be attributed to foreign taxes claimed as a deduction, the IRS said.

The IRS further said that even if Section 6511(d)(3) could be construed to apply to overpayments that could be attributed to foreign tax deductions, the overpayment in Year 2 couldn’t be attributed to a foreign tax paid or accrued; rather, it could be attributed to an NOL deduction carried back from Year 4.  

Finally, the IRS said taxpayers may not stack Sections 6511(d)(2) and 6511(d)(3) to provide a longer period of limitations. The periods key-off of specific dates, and the plain language of the statutes indicates that the periods are mutually exclusive related to any given overpayment, the IRS said.


Contacts
David Auclair
+1 202 521 1515
david.auclair@us.gt.com

Shamik Trivedi
+1 202 521 1511
shamik.trivedi@us.gt.com


Tax professional standards statement
This document supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the subject of this document, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss the potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this document may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this document is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.