Close
Close

Tax Court holds refundable state tax credits must be included in income

RFP
Tax Hot TopicsTax Hot Topics
In Maines v. Commissioner, 144 T.C. No. 8 (March 11, 2015), the Tax Court considered whether certain state tax credits were required to be included in income for federal tax purposes.  

Several types of credits were discussed in the case, but the most notable involved refundable credits issued by New York state. The state labeled the credits as “overpayments” of past state income tax, although the amounts received were not refunds of past tax paid by the taxpayers.  

The taxpayers took the position that the IRS was required to respect the state’s characterization of the amounts as overpayments and therefore should treat the amounts as a return of capital. The Tax Court rejected the taxpayers’ position and held that the IRS wasn’t bound by the label used by the state. The court further held that because the amounts received as refundable credits weren’t a refund of tax paid, the amounts constituted an accession to wealth and were required to be included in the taxpayers’ income for federal tax purposes.

Contacts

Sharon Kay
+1 202 861 4140
sharon.kay@us.gt.com

Ellen Fitzgerald
+1 202 521 1558
ellen.fitzgerald@us.gt.com

Tax professional standards statement
This document supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the subject of this document, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss the potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this document may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this document is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.