House Republicans move to make expired provisions permanent

Tax Hot Topics
Tax Hot TopicsHouse Republicans advanced permanent extensions of several popular expired tax provisions last week despite veto threats from the Obama administration and complaints from Democrats.

More than 50 popular provisions expired at the end of 2014 after they were extended retroactively for just one year in December. House Republicans are repeating the approach they tried last year in an attempt to make some of the provisions permanent. Instead of putting together a comprehensive package to temporarily extend all of the provisions, they proposed to make only a handful permanent. The full House last week packaged six Ways and Means Committee extender bills into two pieces of legislation and approved both easily.

H.R. 644 was approved 279–137 and would make the following provisions permanent:
  • The S corporation basis reduction limit for charitable gifts
  • Increased percentage limits and extended carryforward periods for charitable contributions of conservation easements and capital gain property
  • Tax-free individual retirement account distributions for taxpayers at least 70½

The bill would also expand favorable treatment for charitable contributions of conservation easements from farmers and ranchers to Alaska Native Corporations. It would cut the 2% excise tax rate on private foundation investment income to 1%.

H.R. 636 was approved 272–142 and would make the following provisions permanent:
  • Increased Section 179 expensing limits
  • The reduced five-year holding period for built-in-gains tax after an S corporation conversion
  • Enhanced charitable deduction for contributions of food inventory

The president threatened to veto both bills despite supporting the underlying policy, arguing that the country cannot afford to make the provisions permanent without paying for them.

The House is also expected to vote on two more permanent extender provisions approved by the Ways and Means Committee last week. The bills would make permanent the state and local sales tax deduction and repeal the traditional research credit in favor of a permanent alternative simplified research credit at a 20% rate. Democrats on the committee again objected to the process, complaining that they should have an opportunity to vote on the expired provisions they support.

The House action doesn’t represent significant progress. Congress is unlikely to begin negotiating the expired provisions in earnest until much later in the year. Senate tax writers have no immediate plans to take up the extender bills and are instead focusing on a package of noncontroversial tax provisions and preparing for tax reform. Democrats and Republicans nearly reached an agreement last year that would have extended most of the provisions for two years and made a handful permanent. Republicans could try to resurrect a similar deal this year but may be forced to settle for temporary extensions again.

Tax professional standards statement
This document supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the subject of this document, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax adviser to discuss the potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this document may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this document is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.