IRS rules on determining voting power related to Section 355

Tax Hot Topics
The IRS has ruled in PLR 2015-05-007 that the voting power of stock within the meaning of Section 355(d) was determined by reference to the ability to elect members of the corporation’s board of directors.

The private letter ruling addressed a corporation (Distributing) with two classes of common stock issued and outstanding, Class A and Class B. The Class A stock was high-vote stock (regarding the election of directors) and was convertible into Class B stock. The Class B was low-vote stock and was entitled to an annual dividend preference over the Class A stock. If the outstanding Class A stock fell below a certain amount, every class of the Distributing stock would automatically be entitled to the same voting rights (stock unification).

Distributing proposed to distribute all of the issued and outstanding stock of its wholly owned subsidiary (Controlled) to Distributing’s shareholders (the distribution). Before the distribution, certain Class A shareholders entered into an agreement to convert their Class A stock into Class B stock. The conversion would result in a stock unification, which could be viewed as resulting in a shift of more than 50% of the voting power of Distributing.

Section 355(c) provides that no gain or loss is recognized to a corporation on a distribution of “qualified property” for which Section 355 applies. Qualified property is defined as stock or securities in the controlled corporation under Section 355(a)(1)(A)(ii).  

Section 355(e) provides that stock or securities of Controlled is not qualified property if it is part of a plan for one or more individuals to acquire at least 50% of the total combined voting power of the stock (within the meaning of Section 355(d)(4)) of either Distributing or Controlled.

The IRS first ruled that “voting power” for the purposes of Section 355(d)(4) was measured by reference to the relative ability to elect members of Distributing’s board of directors under Rev. Rul. 69-126.

The IRS also ruled that the stock unification may be disregarded for the purposes of testing whether there was an acquisition of at least 50% of the voting power of the Distributing stock as a result of the stock unification under Section 355(e)(2)(A)(ii).

Andy Cordonnier
+1 202 521 1502

Tax professional standards statement
This document supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the subject of this document, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax adviser to discuss the potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this document may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this document is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.