Close
Close

Revenue procedure eases IRA 60-day rollover rules

RFP
Human Capital Bulletin: Revenue procedure eases IRA 60-day rollover rulesA new revenue procedure makes obtaining relief from the individual retirement account (IRA) 60-day rollover rules simpler.

Rev. Proc. 2016-47 provides relief for taxpayers who have trouble complying with IRA 60-day rollover rules for reasons specified in the revenue procedure. While the law has long permitted the IRS to waive the 60-day timing requirement for events beyond the taxpayer’s reasonable control, this procedure makes obtaining that relief much easier when the problem is due to one of the causes listed.

Sections 402(c)(3) and 408(d)(3) require that any amount distributed to a taxpayer from a qualified retirement plan or IRA that is rolled over to another eligible retirement plan or IRA must be rolled over no later than the 60th day following the date of receipt. (The same rule applies to 403(b) plan distributions.) If the rollover isn’t made within this time frame, the taxpayer must include the distribution in his or her gross income regardless of whether the distribution actually may have been transferred to an eligible retirement plan.

The revenue procedure permits taxpayers to self-certify to the rollover recipient institution that the reason the rollover missed the 60-day deadline was one listed in a model letter provided by the IRS that the taxpayer sends to the recipient institution. So long as the taxpayer has not previously been denied a waiver with respect to the rollover’s timing, the recipient institution and the taxpayer may treat the rollover as timely if the rollover was completed as soon as practicable once the reason for the delay, listed in the letter, ceased to prevent or delay the transfer of the rollover.  

The IRS lists the following reasons as permissible for delaying the rollover beyond the usual 60-day deadline:

  1. An error was committed by the financial institution receiving the contribution or making the distribution to which the contribution relates.
  2. The distribution, having been made in the form of a check, was misplaced and never cashed.
  3. The distribution was deposited into and remained in an account that the taxpayer mistakenly thought was an eligible retirement plan.
  4. The taxpayer’s principal residence was severely damaged.
  5. A member of the taxpayer’s family died.
  6. The taxpayer or a member of the taxpayer’s family was seriously ill.
  7. The taxpayer was incarcerated.
  8. Restrictions were imposed by a foreign country.
  9. A postal error occurred.
  10. The distribution was made on account of a federal levy that was then returned.
  11. The distributing institution delayed providing information that the receiving plan or IRA required to complete the rollover despite the taxpayer’s reasonable efforts to obtain the information.

Taxpayers should note that while they may treat the rollover as timely upon filing the proper form, the IRS reserves the right to disallow the waiver for reasons such as material misstatements in the self-certification letter.

The revenue procedure provides a 30-day safe harbor in which taxpayers may assume they have satisfied the “as-soon-as-practicable” requirement to complete the rollover when the reason for the delay is resolved.

Taxpayers may continue to apply for a hardship exception under Part 3 of Rev. Proc. 2003-16 for reasons other than those noted above.

It’s important to note that under the direct rollover rules, whereby a distribution is transferred directly from one retirement plan or IRA to another, the 60-day rule does not apply because the taxpayer at no time has possession of the funds. This method of rolling over between qualified accounts should normally be considered first.

The revenue procedure shows that issues continue to exist with rollovers in which taxpayers have temporary possession of qualified retirement funds as the IRS seeks to allow reasonable processes but also to prevent abusive transactions in which taxpayers use the funds to essentially make temporary “loans” to themselves by slow or multiple rollover transactions. The Tax Court in the 2014 Baybrow v. Commissioner ruling, for example, agreed with the IRS that the once-per-year rollover rule should apply to all a taxpayer’s accounts in aggregate (rather than on a per-account basis) to prevent the use of sequential rollovers as a way of getting the use of qualified retirement funds for a series of 60-day windows.

Contact Mark Ritter, Managing Director, Human Capital Services, at +1 404 704 0114, for more information.


Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this