Close
Close

4 ways the new inversion regs make it harder to go tax-free

RFP
The Treasury Department’s temporary and proposed regulations to limit inversion transactions added new rules and clarified others related to inversion notices released in 2014 and 2015, which were intended to make inversion deals more cumbersome and expensive. The regulations released April 4 are even more far-reaching, surprising Wall Street and killing what would have been the largest inversion deal ever, Pfizer’s proposed combination with Allergan.
 
Here are four key additions/clarifications the regulations provide:
  1. Identify a foreign acquiring company when a domestic entity acquisition involves multiple steps (such as when a foreign firm acquires substantially all the assets of a U.S. entity, then a second foreign firm acquires most of the assets of the first foreign firm, including the initial acquisition).
  2. Disregard stock of the foreign acquiring company that can be attributed to certain prior domestic entity acquisitions.
  3. Require a controlled foreign corporation (CFC) to recognize gain on certain transfers of assets, described in Section 351, that shift ownership of those assets to a related foreign entity that isn’t a CFC after an inversion transaction.
  4. Clarify the definition of group income for purposes of the substantial business activities test used when determining business activities in a foreign country.

The regulations mark the government’s latest crackdown on inversions and “serial inverters” in particular. In certain scenarios, they subtract the value of the U.S. stock a foreign company had acquired, making the foreign company “smaller.” Then, if the shareholders of the former U.S. company own at least 80% of the combined firm, the government would treat the new combined company as subject to U.S. taxes, even if the company is no longer U.S.-based. There are other potentially adverse tax consequences if the continuing ownership stake is less than 80% but at least 60%.

No doubt tax professionals have many questions and concerns about the proposed regulations, but they should make haste in expressing them. Treasury is accepting comments only through July 7.

Want more information? See the April 19 Tax Hot Topics.

Contact
Cory Perry
International Tax Manager
Washington National Tax Office
T +1 202 521 1509


Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.