Close
Close

How US country-by-country reporting came to be

RFP
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) issued a form of consensus guidance in February 2015, calling for country-by-country (CbC) reporting, which countries have been free to adopt under their local laws. The U.S. responded by issuing its own proposed regulations on Dec. 15, 2015. Those are expected to be finalized by June 30, according to the Treasury Department.

The guidance stems from the OECD’s initiative on base erosion and profit shifting, a 15-point action plan meant to curb tax strategies that shift profits to low- or no-tax locations. The OECD targeted 2016 as the first year for CbC reporting, yet the United States delayed the effective date. Reporting generally would apply to U.S. multinational entities (MNEs) for tax years beginning in 2017. Even if a U.S. MNE parent company isn’t required to report in 2016 in the United States, its foreign subsidiaries may be required to report 2016 information in local jurisdictions under secondary mechanisms. This had led to concern and made some taxpayers wonder: If the United States does not require reporting information in 2016, but a non-U.S. tax authority does require it and posts it, isn’t the cat out of the bag?
 
The Treasury Department’s Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Affairs Robert Stack addressed some of these concerns during a transfer pricing conference on April 28 at the University of San Diego Law School. Stack said Treasury wants to “move toward permitting voluntary submissions for the 2016 year,” with the caveat that “there’s no victory in accepting voluntary filings if the other countries that are partners in the [CbC] plan are not going to accept them as good filings and therefore obviate the need for local filings.” Stack said the United States is making efforts to ensure foreign jurisdictions accept voluntary 2016 reports from U.S. MNEs. Among other comments, he said, “the gap year problem is real, and we feel we have a responsibility to solve it.” He hopes to know more in the coming weeks.

For a plunge into CbC reporting and its impact, see Massaging the knots of country-by-country reporting and Preparing for the new world of tax transparency.



Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.