Read the October Special Edition Economic Currents in PDF
The back and forth between the White House, the House of Representatives and the Senate on the current round of stimulus talks is dizzying. It has made me nauseous, given what is at stake: hunger, evictions and the risk of yet another retrenchment in the overall economy.
Much of what was left of the aid provided by the CARES Act, whether for businesses or households, has been liquidated. Millions of people remain unemployed, despite what will easily be a record pace of growth in the third quarter. Permanent business closures and bankruptcies are accelerating.
A resurgence in COVID-19 cases threatens yet another pullback in spending. Epidemiologists, including doctors at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), have been warning for months that the surge this fall could be the worst of the crisis. Barring a major shift in behavior to mask and distance, those scenarios will be realized.
Most states are expected to limit lockdowns relative to the first round but that won’t prevent economic losses. Baby boomers, who account for about one third of consumer spending, have proven to be among the most skittish when it comes to spending amidst a surge in the pace of infections. They avoid restaurants and bars, cancel travel plans and, sadly, preventive doctor appointments, which has led to a jump in deaths that are not directly tied to COVID. The toll on holiday celebrations will be palpable.
Europe is ahead of us, with the second wave already taking a toll on economic activity. This will deal another blow to U.S. exports and crimp manufacturing activity at a time most factories are still operating well below the level they hit prior to the crisis. (See Chart 1.)
This special edition of Economic Currents
compares the outlook for the economy, with and without another stimulus package. Chart 2 shows the differences between the two extremes; they are stark. With additional aid from Washington, the economy gets back to its previous peak in mid-2021, a year and a half sooner than if we do nothing. That forecast may be too optimistic. The losses that we will suffer during the third wave of infections will be nonlinear; they will compound over time. What was a recession triggered by a health crisis could morph into a financial crisis, from which it would take even longer to recover. The losses in commercial real estate are already large and mounting at home and abroad.
Scenario 1: $1.9 Trillion in Stimulus
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi are currently closing in on a $1.9 trillion stimulus plan - $1.5 trillion in new funding added to about $400 billion in previously appropriated funds. It includes more generous checks for families, smaller supplements to unemployment insurance ($400 instead of $600 per week), funds for a national testing and tracking program, aid for schools and hospitals, transfers to the states and some targeted aid for small businesses.
Speaker Pelosi has said the negotiations may take
until after the election to finalize. That would further
complicate its chances, depending upon who wins the
election. Our own in-house policy expert, Robert Shea,
is optimistic that a deal in some form can be done prior
to the election. The prospects thereafter are nil.
The aid is expected to blunt but not stop the slowdown
in the fourth and first quarters, while it sets the stage
for a more robust rebound once the crisis abates -
after a vaccine and therapeutics become more widely
available. The level of economic activity will return to
its previous peak in 2021 and then accelerate as the
pent-up demand is unleashed.
Those who have money will continue to purchase big-ticket
items such as homes - there are bidding wars on
houses, sight unseen - vehicles, appliances, furniture,
repairs and upgrades to homes. Some of the strength
we saw in spending in September and early October
reflects the push to prepare for a hard winter.
Those who don’t have a lot of extra cash will be able
to once again pay for groceries and cover their rent.
Stimulus checks will be used to pay for outstanding
bills and keep millions of households from starvation
The funding for testing, tracking and therapeutics will not
come soon enough to dramatically mitigate the pending
surge this fall. But it could help us to manage the spread
of the virus along with the availability of a vaccine.
The economy will not be able to fully reopen until a
vaccine becomes available and concerns about its safety
are alleviated. Both Democrats and Republicans worry
that politics will trump safety when it comes to getting a
vaccine to market. Only time and a proven track record
on the vaccine will get more people to take it.
Concerns about how long we remain immune to the
disease once we are vaccinated suggest that a full-scale
reopening could be more labored than many would like.
That is why efforts to stay ahead of testing, tracking and
treating the disease are likely to become a part of any
Employment will take longer to reach its precrisis peak.
With stimulus, we could get there by 2023, or a little
more than three years after the economy cratered. That
is a much faster rebound in employment than we saw
in the wake of the 2008-09 recession when austerity
overshadowed the need for more stimulus. We should be
able to learn from past mistakes.
Longer term, we will need to address the shadow that
COVID casts. Children who lost schooling will need
summer programs to make up for lost time. Community
colleges will have to be leveraged to retrain low-wage
workers. Gaps in our health care system will need to be
filled to deal with the emerging, long-term consequences
of COVID. We will need to invest much more aggressively
in childcare and programs for young adults; the payoffs
have proven to be greater than the costs.
Debt and deficits will need to be dealt with to ensure a
more sustainable fiscal path. Growth alone will not cure
those problems but can alleviate them over time. Best-case
scenarios use COVID as a catalyst for reforms that
make growth more equitable, which would unleash more
rapid overall growth. I hope we learn something from the
inequalities revealed and exacerbated by COVID.
Scenario 2: Nothing
The second scenario assumes that our elected officials
fail to pass much-needed aid in the Senate, where the
hurdles to enactment prior to the election are greater.
It is unclear we will get anything until the next president
is sworn in. Under such a scenario, that would be late
January or early February, an eternity for households
that are already running on fumes.
Much depends on the outcome of the election and
whether a lame-duck Senate will do anything. My
colleague Robert Shea says that the probability of a post-election
deal is low.
Even then, the composition of the Senate will matter.
Many who resisted additional stimulus today are likely
to remain reluctant to do more in 2021, although risks to
the outlook with no stimulus are to the downside. Hunger
and homelessness will rise if we do nothing, which hurts
us all and increases the threat that the recession could
metastasize into a more traditional recession or worse,
a full-blown financial crisis. That would diminish our
financial architecture and leave much deeper cracks in
Our analysis shows the repercussions of a third wave or
“second surge” as many epidemiologists are calling it.
Europe is already moving into it. We are not far behind.
As of the writing of this report, cases and hospitalizations
were rising in all but two states in the country.
We have consumers and firms pulling back without
stringent lockdowns. Most states and localities would
like to avoid the draconian measures that failed to keep
infections in the U.S. under control last spring.
“Hunger and homelessness will rise if we do nothing”
That said, we can’t rule out measures that limit mobility, given the threat that the next surge poses to our health system. Some cities are again setting up makeshift hospitals in stadiums and convention halls to deal with the jump in cases. Staffing is also a problem, as many medical personnel are burned out and are having a hard time caring for children still at home.
Europeans hoped to avoid lockdowns as well but some have since acquiesced, given the sheer volume of illness they are now seeing. Shutdowns are being implemented with record cases across the continent. Ireland has imposed the most aggressive measures, shutting down for six weeks to contain the spread of the virus. More limited curfews and lockdowns are unfolding in France, Spain and the UK.
This is going to exacerbate the toll that a surge in the virus takes on the U.S. economy. Exports are expected to slow or worse after rebounding over the summer and in October. Supply chain disruptions could exacerbate those problems, although so far Asia - where supply chains are the most vulnerable - has used masks and testing to more effectively manage outbreaks and keep factories running. The manufacturing exodus that many predicted from China has not occurred, despite its role in the spread at the start of the pandemic.
The overall U.S. economy doesn’t reach its previous peak until early 2023. The level of economic activity remains more than $1.2 trillion short of the pace we would see with stimulus by the end of 2023. Employment won’t fully recover until well into 2024.
Worse yet, risks are to the downside with much deeper scarring of the labor market and the financial system. Long-term unemployment, which is already rising, takes a toll on physical and mental health and erodes skills. Those losses, combined with increased bankruptcies, business closures and widespread consolidation, could reduce growth potential for years to come.
Frankly, I have a hard time thinking about how bad things could get if the federal government does nothing. The reality of losses will intensify the political pressure on our elected officials to act. The only question is when, and that matters. The prospect of waiting until January or February looks like an eternity if you can’t feed your family for a week now.
The Fed Intervenes
The Federal Reserve will not stand idly by. It could work with the Treasury to further ease conditions in the Main Street lending program. This would unleash hundreds of billions in loans for small and mid-sized firms and help for nonprofits to stay afloat during the worst of the crisis. It could also buy longer-term municipal bonds to provide state and local governments a longer runway before they have to cut budgets more aggressively.
The Fed has discussed yield curve controls, which would help finance the costs of more spending by the government. That is where the largest bang for the buck can be found. The multipliers on government spending rise when monetary and fiscal policy are in sync.
Why not just let the Fed fix it? Because the Fed is still limited to lending, not spending; members are not elected officials. Pushing more of the burden onto central bankers blurs the line with fiscal policy and undermines the Fed’s ability to act independently in the future. There will come a day when the Fed needs to take the punch bowl away from the party. That is an economy we can only hope for.
The consensus among economists for additional stimulus is extremely high. That is not surprising. We are all looking at a similar set of scenarios, some markedly worse given the downside risks of the recession morphing into a financial crisis as well as the health crisis. The debt we would take on to cure the problem is less than the human misery and the shortfall in growth would be if we do nothing. Congress: Get the details ironed out and act. It shouldn’t be this hard.
Copyright © 2020 Diane Swonk – All rights reserved. The information provided herein is believed to be obtained from sources deemed to be accurate, timely and reliable. However, no assurance is given in that respect. The reader should not rely on this information in making economic, financial, investment or any other decisions. This communication does not constitute an offer or solicitation, or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any security, investment or other product. Likewise, this communication serves to provide certain opinions on current market conditions, economic policy or trends and is not a recommendation to engage in, or refrain from engaging, in a particular course of action.