T +1 206 398 2485
Jamie C. Yesnowitz
T +1 202 521 1504
T +1 312 302 8617
T +1 513 345 4540
T +1 215 814 1743
On March 14, 2019, Washington Gov. Jay Inslee signed legislation simplifying the state’s economic nexus provisions for out-of-state sellers and marketplace facilitators without a physical presence in the state.1
The new law removes the state’s 200-transaction threshold for purposes of determining retail sales tax collection requirements, leaving in place only the $100,000 sales threshold; eliminates the option for remote sellers and marketplace facilitators to comply with notice and reporting requirements; reduces the annual sales threshold for purposes of the Business and Occupation (B&O) tax to $100,000, while eliminating the property and payroll thresholds; and eliminates the state’s click-through nexus provisions.
Prior to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair
Washington enacted marketplace facilitator rules that became effective Jan. 1, 2018.3
Under these rules, remote sellers,4
meeting certain statutory criteria were required to either collect and remit retail sales tax or comply with notice and reporting requirements.7
The collection and reporting requirements applied to remote sellers or marketplace facilitators having Washington sourced gross receipts of at least $10,000 during the current or immediately preceding calendar year. 8
In the Wayfair
decision, the Court rejected the physical presence requirement for purposes of sales and use tax nexus, finding that South Dakota’s economic nexus statute satisfied the substantial nexus standard under the U.S. Constitution. Soon after the Wayfair
decision, Washington adopted an economic nexus standard for retail sales tax consistent with South Dakota’s economic nexus provisions that were sustained by the Court. Under these added provisions, remote sellers having more than $100,000 in Washington annual gross retail sales or 200 separate transactions in the state in the current or prior calendar year were required to collect and remit retail sales tax from Washington customers.9
These thresholds became effective Oct. 1, 2018.
In addition to the retail sales tax, Washington imposes a gross receipts-based B&O tax. Several years prior to Wayfair
, Washington adopted an economic nexus threshold test for out-of-state businesses engaging in business in Washington. For the 2013-2017 tax years, a nonresident business created economic nexus and a B&O tax filing obligation if the business had more than $53,000 in property or payroll in the state; had more than $267,000 in gross receipts in the state; or at least 25% of the business’s total property, payroll or receipts were in Washington during the current or immediately preceding calendar year.10
For the 2018 tax year, the payroll and property thresholds were increased to $57,000 and the sales threshold to $285,000.11
Simplified economic nexus rules
The newly enacted legislation is designed to simplify Washington’s current economic nexus provisions in a number of ways. The new rules impact both the state’s retail sales tax and B&O tax.
Retail sales tax
The economic nexus law implements important revised provisions pertaining to marketplace facilitators, bringing such vendors under the same collection requirements as remote sellers.12
Effective July 1, 2019, the term “seller” is revised to include marketplace facilitators,13
whether making sales in their own right or facilitating sales on behalf of marketplace sellers.14
The definitions and underlying concepts of a “marketplace facilitator” and “marketplace seller” remain largely the same, and references to the term “referrer” are removed under the new law.
Most notably, the legislation eliminates the 200-transaction threshold from Washington’s economic nexus standard for purposes of the retail sales tax, in addition to amending the way in which the $100,000 sales threshold is calculated.15
Effective March 14, 2019, remote sellers or marketplace facilitators are deemed to have economic nexus with Washington for retail sales tax purposes when, in the current or previous calendar year, they have more than $100,000 in cumulative gross receipts from retail sales in Washington.16
Through Dec. 31, 2019, the $100,000 gross receipts threshold applies to all retail sales sourced to Washington, including sales made through a marketplace facilitator.17
However, effective Jan. 1, 2020, the gross receipts threshold will instead be based on all gross income
attributed to Washington instead of gross receipts from retail sales.18
For marketplace facilitators, gross receipts include gross proceeds from the facilitator’s own sales into Washington and gross proceeds from a marketplace seller’s sales into Washington through the facilitator’s marketplace, regardless of whether the marketplace sellers have nexus with Washington.19
In an effort to further simplify the retail sales tax landscape for remote sellers, the new measure removes the election to comply with notice and reporting requirements instead of collecting and remitting retail sales tax, effective July 1, 2019.20
The legislation also eliminates the $10,000 sales threshold for remote sellers and marketplace facilitators, leaving the $100,000 sales threshold as the sole determination for economic nexus.21
This change is also effective on July 1, 2019.
Similar to other states proposing marketplace bills in response to Wayfair
, Washington’s new law requires marketplace facilitators to collect and remit retail sales tax on all taxable retail sales made or facilitated by the marketplace facilitator, whether in its own right or as an agent of the marketplace seller, regardless of whether the marketplace seller is subject to a tax collection obligation.22
This provision is retroactive to Oct. 1, 2018. Additionally, beginning on Jan. 1, 2020, marketplace facilitators having nexus with Washington will be required to collect and remit all other transaction taxes and fees on their third-party sales. 23
Finally, the enacted legislation repeals Washington’s click-through nexus provisions. Originally enacted in 2015, these rules required remote sellers to collect and remit sales tax if: (i) the remote seller entered into an agreement with Washington residents and paid a commission for referrals to the remote seller; and (ii) the cumulative gross receipts from such referrals exceeded $10,000 during the preceding calendar year.24
The click-through nexus rules are eliminated effective March 14, 2019.
The new law also implements several changes with respect to Washington’s existing B&O tax economic nexus standards. First, effective Jan. 1, 2020, the sales threshold for B&O tax purposes is reduced from $285,000 in gross receipts from retail sales in Washington to $100,000 in cumulative gross income attributed to Washington, bringing this threshold in line with the state’s sales threshold for retail sales tax purposes.25
In addition, the $53,000 property and payroll thresholds are eliminated for purposes of the B&O tax, along with the standard establishing nexus if a business has at least 25% of total payroll, property or sales in the state. 26
Washington’s revision of its retail sales tax economic nexus thresholds continues a growing trend among states to jettison the separate transaction threshold in favor of a single receipts threshold. Beginning in 2020, Washington has also revised its measurement of the $100,000 sales threshold to include cumulative gross income from the immediately preceding calendar year, instead of merely gross income from retail sales. As one of the first states to implement use tax notice and reporting requirements for non-collecting sellers before Wayfair
, Washington has also joined other states in removing this option, with notice and reporting requirements becoming increasingly moot in light of the Court’s approval of an economic nexus standard in Wayfair
While Washington already had an economic nexus standard in place for B&O tax before Wayfair
, it has reduced the current $285,000 sales threshold to $100,000 in Washington cumulative gross receipts, matching the South Dakota sales threshold upheld in Wayfair
. Emboldened by the Court’s decision, Washington joins a handful of jurisdictions that are moving to enact economic nexus provisions for income or gross receipts taxes or to amend already existing standards.
The enactment of Washington’s initial marketplace fairness law imposing collection and reporting requirements, coupled with a subsequent administrative pronouncement in light of the Wayfair
decision, presented much confusion for both remote sellers and marketplace facilitators making sales to Washington customers. The newly enacted legislation represents a welcome change for such vendors in that it applies Washington’s economic nexus provisions consistently to different out-of-state businesses selling into Washington. Further, the new provisions seek to streamline Washington’s economic nexus thresholds with respect to both retail sales tax and B&O tax. For example, under current B&O tax provisions, a remote seller with $200,000 in annual Washington gross receipts would have created retail sales tax nexus but not B&O tax nexus with Washington. Under the new law, the same seller would be subject to both retail sales tax and B&O tax filing obligations, having exceeded the single $100,000 gross receipts nexus threshold that now applies to both tax types.
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.
The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.