T +1 213 596 8420
T +1 408 346 4325
T +1 949 608 5330
T +1 415 318 2230
Jamie C. Yesnowitz
T +1 202 521 1504
T +1 312 302 8617
T +1 513 345 4540
T +1 215 814 1743
On April 25, 2019, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 147 into law, which modifies California’s sales and use tax economic nexus provisions for remote sellers without a physical presence in the state, and establishes marketplace collection requirements.1
The legislation imposes an economic nexus threshold of $500,000 in sales of tangible personal property for both state and local district use taxes, superseding the previous $100,000 sales threshold and 200 transaction threshold previously adopted via administrative pronouncement by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA). The economic nexus provisions are effective April 1, 2019.
In South Dakota v. Wayfair
, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the physical presence requirement for purposes of sales and use tax nexus, finding that South Dakota’s economic nexus statute satisfied the substantial nexus standard under the U.S. Constitution.2
California did not take specific action in response to the Wayfair
decision until December 2018, when the CDTFA issued a special notice announcing that it would adopt an economic nexus threshold of $100,000 in sales or 200 separate transactions for purposes of state use tax for out-of-state retailers.3
The standard applied to out-of-state retailers making taxable sales of tangible personal property into California on or after April 1, 2019.
The CDTFA concurrently issued a special notice establishing the same economic nexus thresholds for purposes of California local district use taxes.4
Effective April 1, 2019, any retailer whose sales of tangible personal property into a district exceeded either the sales or transaction thresholds was considered to be doing business in that district. As such, retailers would be required to collect that district’s use tax on sales made for delivery in that district.
Revised economic nexus standard
Under California law, a “retailer engaged in business in this state” has a use tax collection and remittance obligation in California. The legislation expands this definition to include economic nexus provisions for remote sellers, and creates similar collection requirements for marketplace facilitators.
Under the new law, a retailer having total combined sales of tangible personal property for delivery into California in excess of $500,000 in the preceding or current calendar year, is considered to be a retailer engaged in business in the state. 5
There is no alternative threshold for the number of transactions to customers in the state. Sales by related entities are included in the calculation of the sales threshold.6
Similarly, remote sellers are also now required to collect local district use taxes once they exceed the $500,000 sales threshold, regardless of the amount of sales made into each local district.7
These provisions supersede the $100,000 sales and 200 transaction thresholds administratively adopted by the CDTFA, with an effective date of April 1, 2019.8
The legislation eliminates California’s affiliate nexus9
and click-through nexus provisions10
that were previously in place under the state’s sales and use tax law. The bill also includes a temporary relief provision for small businesses not previously subject to California’s new economic nexus provisions. Under this provision, penalties and interest assessed against a retailer may be waived by the CDTFA for tax periods from April 1, 2019, through Dec. 31, 2022, where the total sales of tangible personal property into California is $1 million or less if the retailer was not required to be registered for California sales and use tax under prior law.11
The bill also establishes new sales tax collection and remittance requirements for marketplace facilitators. Effective Oct. 1, 2019, a marketplace facilitator12
is considered to be a seller and retailer for each sale facilitated through its marketplace for purposes of determining whether it has a sales tax filing obligation in California.13
As such, marketplace facilitators are subject to the state’s $500,000 sales threshold for purposes of determining whether they have economic nexus with California. Sales counting toward the threshold include sales made on the facilitator’s own behalf and on behalf of all related persons, as well as sales facilitated on behalf of marketplace sellers.14
A marketplace facilitator may be relieved of liability for use tax if it can demonstrate to the CDTFA that it made a reasonable effort to obtain accurate information from an unrelated marketplace seller and that failure to remit the correct amount of tax was due to incorrect or incomplete information received from the marketplace seller.15
The marketplace facilitator tax relief provisions apply to sales made through Dec. 31, 2022.
In response to the enactment of an increased $500,000 sales threshold for remote sellers, the CDTFA issued Special Notice L-632, specifying that the new use tax collection requirements and increased sales thresholds carry an operative date of April 1, 2019.16
Special Notice L-632 clarifies that the new collection requirements as provided under the law supersede the CDTFA’s previous direction as provided in its former special notices released in December 2018.
California’s increased sales threshold of $500,000 represents a notable departure from the $100,000 sales threshold and 200-transaction thresholds that were established administratively. The CDTFA modeled the initial thresholds after South Dakota’s thresholds, which were sustained by the U.S. Supreme Court in Wayfair. The California legislature eventually settled on a higher threshold likely in recognition of the market considerations for smaller businesses selling into California, a state with a population over 40 times as large as that of South Dakota. California joins only a handful of larger market states adhering to a $500,000 sales threshold through statutory or regulatory guidance, such as Massachusetts, Ohio and Texas.
The new $500,000 state-level sales threshold also applies to local district use taxes. However, the law provides that there is no separate threshold that must be exceeded on a district-by-district level for remote sellers to be required to collect and remit local district taxes. This approach differs from that taken by CDTFA as outlined in its special notice, which specified that remote sellers would be subject to district collection requirements only if they exceeded the threshold based on sales into each local district. This provision increases the likelihood that a remote seller will be required to collect and remit local district use taxes even in districts with minimal sales activity, including districts where the seller has only a single sale.
Although the legislation provides that the nexus thresholds for remote sellers are effective April 1, 2019, the actual date of enforcement for the new $500,000 sales threshold is April 25, the date that the bill was signed by the governor. This created some ambiguity regarding the legislation’s interaction with the $100,000 sales or 200 transaction threshold established by the CDTFA, which technically took effect on April 1. However, the issuance of Special Notice L-632 makes it unlikely that the CDTFA would enforce the thresholds that were in place before the April 25 enactment date.
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.
The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.