FAQ: New rules for meal, travel and entertainment deduction

Closeup dining tableThe Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) amended Section 274 to change the rules for deducting certain types of meal, entertainment and travel expenses. The changes affect only a narrow group of expenses, but they can represent large deductions for taxpayers. In addition, because Section 274 divides meal, entertainment, and travel expenses into so many different categories, it can be difficult to determine which costs are deductible, partially deductible or not deductible at all.

The following information answers some frequently asked questions on the changes, and provides insights and next steps for taxpayers implementing the changes. Unless otherwise provided, the answers apply to expenses incurred after Dec. 31, 2017.

What has changed for meal expenses? TCJA repeals the exception that provided a full 100% deduction for food or beverages excludable from employee income as a de minimis fringe benefit under Section 132(e). These costs are now subject to the general 50% limit on deducting meals.

Grant Thornton Insight: The previous full deduction for meals described in Section 132(e) generally applied to a cost that, by its nature, is so small as to make accounting for it administratively impracticable. Unless the IRS issues rules of convenience in future guidance, companies will face the challenge of quantifying these costs and deducting only 50% of the expense.
What happens to meal expenses in 2026? If the law is not amended, then no deduction would be allowed for any expense incurred after Dec. 31, 2025, for:

  • The operation of an eating facility described in Section 132(e)(2)
  • Food or beverages associated with such facility (including expenses under Section 132(e)(1) relating to de minimis fringes)
  • Meals for the convenience of the employer described in Section 119(a)

Grant Thornton Insight: This change will reverse taxpayers’ preference for how meal costs are characterized. Costs that used to be eligible for a favorable exception from the 50% limit prior to 2018 are not only losing the full 100% deduction, but will not be eligible for any deduction beginning in 2026. It should be noted the statutory construction of this legislative change is not completely consistent. The provision reducing the 100% deduction to 50% in 2018 applies to all de minimis fringe benefits under Section 132(e). The complete disallowance of the deduction in 2026 only applies to de minimis fringe benefits associated with an employer facility, so that other meals qualifying for a de minimis fringe could still potentially qualify for a 50% deduction.
Are any meal expenses still eligible for 100% deduction? Yes. TCJA only repeals the de minimis fringe benefit exception discussed from the 50% meals limit, and does not affect meal costs qualifying for other general exceptions offering a 100% deduction under Section 274(e):

  • Expenses treated as compensation
  • Reimbursed expenses incurred in connection with performance of services (for example, in a situation where an employee incurs expenses and is reimbursed by an employer, this exception applies to the employee, not the employer)
  • Recreational expenses for employees
  • Items available to the public
  • Entertainment sold to customers
  • Expenses includible in income of persons who are not employees

Are there changes to deductions for meals already subject to the 50% limit? No. Costs for food and beverages that previously qualified for a 50% deduction still qualify for a 50% deduction (with the potential exception for meals associated with entertainment discussed below).

What has changed for entertainment expenses? TCJA disallows any deduction of costs for activities considered entertainment, amusement or recreation under Section 274(a). Previously, Section 274 generally allowed taxpayers to deduct 50% of the costs of entertainment, amusement or recreation that is directly related to (or, in certain cases, associated with) the active conduct of a taxpayer’s trade or business, with certain limitations on tickets, sky boxes and clubs.

Grant Thornton Insight: It is unclear how this change will impact the deductibility of food or beverage expenses with respect to an activity generally considered to be entertainment, amusement or recreation. Business meals were previously considered 50% deductible if incurred during, before or after a bona fide business discussion (commonly referred to as the directly related or associated requirements). The IRS has indicated in informal discussions that it is aware of this issue and intends to offer guidance. Taxpayers should consider capturing and tracking these separate meal costs pending IRS guidance.
Are any entertainment expenses still deductible? Yes. TCJA does not affect the 100% deduction available under Section 274(e)(4) for recreational, social or similar activities (including facilities) expenses primarily for the benefit of employees. Entertainment that qualifies under other general exceptions under Section 274(e), such as expenses treated as compensation, items available to the public or entertainment sold to customers, is also still eligible for a 100% deduction. TCJA does not affect expenses that are not considered entertainment, for example the cost of a hotel room for an employee on business travel.

What has changed for transportation expenses? TCJA disallows any deduction for providing a qualified transportation fringe benefit to employees, and, except as necessary for ensuring the safety of an employee, any expense for providing transportation for commuting between an employee’s residence and place of employment. The deduction for other kinds of transportation expenses, such as flights for employee business travel, has not changed.

Grant Thornton Insight: TCJA did not define the term “employee’s residence” or “employee’s place of employment.” Future guidance from the IRS defining these terms will impact the scope of this change.
See these related articles: Dining table
Domestic business travel may have unforeseen costs

Portrait new business owners by empty
US tax reform Q&A for real estate leaders

Boss employee handshaking
M&A impact of pass-through conversion

For more information contact: Dave AuclairDave Auclair
Managing Principal, Washington National Tax Office
T +1 202 521 1515

Debbie ShiDebbie Shi
Manager, Washington National Tax Office
T +1 202 521 1501

Tax professional standards statement
This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.