Loss standard met with sub’s historic gross receipts


The IRS recently ruled (PLR 202140002) that the gross receipts of a corporation included the historic gross receipts of its liquidated subsidiary corporation for purposes of the gross receipts test under Section 165(g)(3) for the worthless stock deduction.


The private letter ruling addressed a corporation (“US Sub”) that directly and wholly owned a foreign subsidiary holding corporation (“Holding Co.”), which in turn directly and wholly owned two foreign subsidiary corporations (“Foreign Sub 1” and “Foreign Sub 2.”). Foreign Sub 1 was formed to develop a specified product and Foreign Sub 2 was formed as the European operating corporation to facilitate the development and ultimate exploitation of the product.


The U.S. corporation later concluded that the monetization of the product was impossible, and eliminated Foreign Sub 2’s workforce and disposed of substantially all of its assets, eventually leading to its insolvency. Holding Co. elected to treat Foreign Sub 2 as a disregarded entity (DRE) for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which was represented by the taxpayer to qualify as a liquidation under Section 332. Then, US Sub elected to treat Holding Co. as a DRE. A third-party appraiser determined that the stock of Holding Co., Foreign Sub 1, and Foreign Sub 2 were worthless on the effective date of the election for Holding Co.


At issue was whether the taxpayer could take an ordinary worthless stock deduction for the Holding Co. stock based on the historic gross receipts of Holding Co.’s prior subsidiaries even though it had not had any gross receipts itself since its incorporation.


Section 165(g)(3) provides that certain taxpayers may claim an ordinary loss for worthless securities in a corporation if certain requirements are met—including a requirement that more than 90% of the corporation’s aggregate gross receipts for all taxable years were from sources other certain specified passive sources. The legislative history of Section 165(g)(3) provides that Congressional intent for enacting the gross receipts test was to determine whether a subsidiary was: (i) an operating company—for which an ordinary loss may be allowed; or (ii) a holding or investment company—for which an ordinary loss is not allowed.


The IRS ruled that US Sub can take into account the historic gross receipts of Foreign Sub 2 for purposes of the gross receipts test of the Holding Co. stock. Because Holding Co. had no gross receipts since its inception, presumably it would not have met the gross receipts test without the gross receipts of Foreign Sub 2.



Tax professional standards statement

This content supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax professional to discuss their potential application to your particular situation. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this content may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with or attached to this content is not intended by Grant Thornton LLP to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal or tax advice provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.


More tax hot topics